Citation: Oa. Taillieu, AGENCY ACTION - OSMS REGULATIONS UNDER STRICT SCRUTINY FROM THE DC CIRCUIT, The George Washington law review, 66(4), 1998, pp. 956-964
Citation: Jd. Clopper, A REJECTION OF THE CALIFORNIA LEV PROGRAM AND THE NORTHEAST OZONE TRANSPORT REGION, The George Washington law review, 66(4), 1998, pp. 965-971
Citation: Mc. Boteler, AN EXAMINATION OF THE PRESIDENTIAL COMMUNICATIONS PRIVILEGE - WHO DOES IT COVER AND HOW IS IT OVERCOME, The George Washington law review, 66(4), 1998, pp. 972-979
Citation: Ja. Gans, A LIMITED GATEKEEPING ROLE FOR TRIAL COURTS IN DETERMINING THE ADMISSIBILITY OF EXPERT MEDICAL TESTIMONY, The George Washington law review, 66(4), 1998, pp. 980-987
Citation: J. Kane, PRESERVING THE MARITAL COMMUNICATIONS PRIVILEGE IN SUBPOENA ENFORCEMENT PROCEEDINGS, The George Washington law review, 66(4), 1998, pp. 988-995
Citation: Sa. Mason, THE NATIONAL-SECURITY COUNCIL IS NOT AN AGENCY UNDER THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT, The George Washington law review, 66(4), 1998, pp. 996-1006
Citation: P. Samii, THE DEATH ON THE HIGH SEAS ACT AS A BARRIER TO THE RECOVERY OF NONPECUNIARY DAMAGES, The George Washington law review, 66(4), 1998, pp. 1007-1014
Citation: Bl. Kibria, LINKING AN EMPLOYERS REFUSAL TO BARGAIN WITH THE SUBSEQUENT LOSS OF MAJORITY SUPPORT FOR A UNION, The George Washington law review, 66(4), 1998, pp. 1015-1023
Citation: Ac. Kless, ABROGATING COLLECTIVE-BARGAINING AGREEMENTS - FACILITATING RAILROAD MERGERS AT THE EXPENSE OF UNIONIZED LABOR, The George Washington law review, 66(4), 1998, pp. 1024-1030
Citation: Jr. Lubin, THE LEGALITY OF MANDATORY ARBITRATION CLAUSES IN INDIVIDUAL EMPLOYMENT CONTRACTS, The George Washington law review, 66(4), 1998, pp. 1031-1039
Citation: S. Mortazavi, NO IMPLIED RIGHT TO ATTORNEYS FEES UNDER THE NATIONAL LABOR-RELATIONSACT, The George Washington law review, 66(4), 1998, pp. 1040-1049
Citation: Vd. Schaper, AN EMPLOYER COMMITS AN UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICE WHEN IT ATTEMPTS TO REVERSE THE RIGHT TO CHALLENGE A UNIONS CERTIFICATION DURING COLLECTIVE-BARGAINING, The George Washington law review, 66(4), 1998, pp. 1050-1058
Citation: Mf. Kotlow, THE HATCH ACT REFORM AMENDMENTS DID NOT CREATE GOVERNMENT LIABILITY FOR THE FAILURE TO GARNISH EMPLOYEE WAGES, The George Washington law review, 66(4), 1998, pp. 1059-1065
Citation: D. Lee, HOLDING THE FEDERAL-GOVERNMENT LIABLE FOR CURRENT BASIS FEE ENHANCEMENTS REQUIRES AN EXPLICIT WAIVER OF SOVEREIGN-IMMUNITY FROM INTEREST, The George Washington law review, 66(4), 1998, pp. 1066-1073
Citation: THE UNITED-STATES-COURT-OF-APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT-OF-COLUMBIA-CIRCUIT - AUGUST 1996 JULY 1997 - CIRCUIT JUDGES, The George Washington law review, 66(4), 1998, pp. 1074-1078
Citation: Sl. Hayford, A NEW PARADIGM FOR COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION - RETHINKING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN REASONED AWARDS AND THE JUDICIAL STANDARDS FOR VACATUR, The George Washington law review, 66(3), 1998, pp. 443-507
Citation: Ge. Maggs, IPSE DIXIT - THE RESTATEMENT (SECOND) OF CONTRACTS AND THE MODERN DEVELOPMENT OF CONTRACT LAW, The George Washington law review, 66(3), 1998, pp. 508-555
Citation: Lj. Augustine, DISABLING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INTENTIONAL DISCRIMINATION AND COMPENSATORY DAMAGES UNDER TITLE II OF THE AMERICANS-WITH-DISABILITIES-ACT, The George Washington law review, 66(3), 1998, pp. 592-623
Citation: Jf. Herold, WAGES, WORKERS, AND POTENTIAL WINDFALLS - RETHINKING SECTION 8(A)(3) LABOR DISPUTES IN A CAPITALIST ECONOMY, The George Washington law review, 66(3), 1998, pp. 657-685
Citation: Gc. Rubin, A REVIEW OF RATIONALES AND RATIONALIZATIONS - REGULATING THE ELECTRONIC MEDIA - CORNREVERE,R, The George Washington law review, 66(3), 1998, pp. 686-697