Citation: T. Weiner, ARBITRATORS HAVE NO DUTY TO INVESTIGATE UNKNOWN CONNECTIONS TO PARTIES, The George Washington law review, 65(4-5), 1997, pp. 616-621
Citation: Hm. Gruber, ADDING A NONDIVERSE PARTY PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE25(C), The George Washington law review, 65(4-5), 1997, pp. 633-637
Citation: Rj. Hines, AFTER LEATHERMAN, NOTICE PLEADING WILL SUSTAIN A MOTION TO DISMISS A CLAIM UNDER SECTION-1983, The George Washington law review, 65(4-5), 1997, pp. 638-644
Citation: Km. Lesch, AGGRESSIVE APPLICATION OF FEDERAL-JURISDICTION UNDER THE YOUNGER ABSTENTION DOCTRINE TO SECTION-1983 DAMAGE CLAIMS, The George Washington law review, 65(4-5), 1997, pp. 645-652
Citation: Ns. Gindi, DISMISSAL OF A PETITION FOR TAX REDETERMINATION UNDER THE FUGITIVE DISENTITLEMENT DOCTRINE - SATISFYING A HIGHER STANDARD, The George Washington law review, 65(4-5), 1997, pp. 661-668
Citation: Ml. Petock, LIVING UP TO THE STRICT REQUIREMENTS OF FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 4(A)(6), The George Washington law review, 65(4-5), 1997, pp. 669-676
Citation: Rm. Notigan, SETTLING THE APPLICATION OF FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL-PROCEDURE-68 IN BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS, The George Washington law review, 65(4-5), 1997, pp. 687-692
Citation: J. Leone, SPRINTS EXPENSIVE FAILURE TO ACT - INVOKING THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS TO BAR RECOVERY OF DAMAGES FOR UNLAWFULLY HIGH DDS RATES, The George Washington law review, 65(4-5), 1997, pp. 719-726
Citation: B. Corbett, FIRST-AMENDMENT PROTECTION AND DUE-PROCESS GUARANTEES IN THE D.C. WORKPLACE, The George Washington law review, 65(4-5), 1997, pp. 727-734
Citation: Md. Stear, OPERATION MEDIA CONTROL - THE MILITARYS ASSAULT ON THE FIRST-AMENDMENT RIGHT TO ACCESS, The George Washington law review, 65(4-5), 1997, pp. 735-742
Citation: Lj. Augustine, PARENT AND LOCAL EDUCATION AGENCY RIGHTS IN THE EVALUATION AND TESTING OF STUDENTS UNDER THE INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES EDUCATION ACT, The George Washington law review, 65(4-5), 1997, pp. 750-757
Citation: Dd. Riley, FILERS BEWARE - THE DC-CIRCUIT REQUIRES MORE SPECIFIC ALLEGATIONS IN EEOC TITLE-VII CHARGES, The George Washington law review, 65(4-5), 1997, pp. 758-763
Citation: Ap. Barlow, LOSS OF RETIREMENT BENEFITS AFTER CORPORATE SALE DOES NOT VIOLATE ERISA, The George Washington law review, 65(4-5), 1997, pp. 764-770
Citation: J. Pearlman, ESTABLISHING THE CORRECT RATE WITHIN THE ZONE OF REASONABLENESS - HOWFAR CAN FERC GO, The George Washington law review, 65(4-5), 1997, pp. 771-777
Citation: Pe. Perkowski, READY OR NOT, HERE IT COMES - THE DEPARTMENT-OF-ENERGY NUCLEAR WASTE-DISPOSAL REQUIREMENTS UNDER THE NUCLEAR WASTE POLICY ACT OF 1982, The George Washington law review, 65(4-5), 1997, pp. 778-785
Citation: Je. Chung, REFINING THE DEFINITION OF AN ADVISORY-COMMITTEE UNDER FACA - WHY THECLINTON LEGAL EXPENSE TRUST-FUND IS OUTSIDE THE SCOPE, The George Washington law review, 65(4-5), 1997, pp. 786-791
Citation: Kl. Peters, A CONTRACT IS A CONTRACT IS A ... GRANT - AN APPLICATION OF PRIVACY ACT SECTION (K)(5) TO NATIONAL-SCIENCE-FOUNDATION GRANTS, The George Washington law review, 65(4-5), 1997, pp. 792-800