Citation: Ap. Harris et Mm. Shultz, A(NOTHER) CRITIQUE OF PURE REASON - TOWARD CIVIC VIRTUE IN LEGAL-EDUCATION, Stanford law review, 45(6), 1993, pp. 1773-1805
Citation: Bo. Hing, RAISING PERSONAL IDENTIFICATION ISSUES OF CLASS, RACE, ETHNICITY, GENDER, SEXUAL ORIENTATION, PHYSICAL-DISABILITY, AND AGE IN LAWYERING COURSES, Stanford law review, 45(6), 1993, pp. 1807-1833
Citation: Ma. Olivas, REFLECTIONS ON PROFESSORIAL ACADEMIC-FREEDOM - 2ND THOUGHTS ON THE 3RD ESSENTIAL FREEDOM, Stanford law review, 45(6), 1993, pp. 1835-1858
Citation: Tl. Shaffer, ERASTIAN AND SECTARIAN ARGUMENTS IN RELIGIOUSLY AFFILIATED AMERICAN LAW-SCHOOLS, Stanford law review, 45(6), 1993, pp. 1859-1879
Citation: Daj. Richards, LIBERAL POLITICAL-CULTURE AND THE MARGINALIZED VOICE - INTERPRETIVE RESPONSIBILITY AND THE AMERICAN LAW-SCHOOL, Stanford law review, 45(6), 1993, pp. 1955-1979
Citation: Db. Wilkins, 2 PATHS TO THE MOUNTAINTOP - THE ROLE OF LEGAL-EDUCATION IN SHAPING THE VALUES OF BLACK CORPORATE LAWYERS, Stanford law review, 45(6), 1993, pp. 1981-2026
Citation: Mr. Gleiberman, FROM FAST CARS TO FAST-FOOD - OVERBROAD PROTECTION OF PRODUCT TRADE DRESS UNDER SECTION 43(A) OF THE LANHAM-ACT, Stanford law review, 45(6), 1993, pp. 2037-2072
Citation: Je. Horne, THE BRADY BUNCH AND OTHER FICTIONS - HOW COURTS DECIDE CHILD-CUSTODY DISPUTES INVOLVING REMARRIED PARENTS, Stanford law review, 45(6), 1993, pp. 2073-2142
Authors:
COUGHENOUR JC
HUG P
PATEL MH
BIRD TW
HENSLER DR
MCKEOWN MM
RESNIK J
SHIELDS H
Citation: Jc. Coughenour et al., EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF THE PRELIMINARY-REPORT OF THE 9TH CIRCUIT TASK-FORCE ON GENDER BIAS, Stanford law review, 45(6), 1993, pp. 2153-2176