Citation: A. Gopal et Ce. Pollard, DIFFERENCES BETWEEN WORKSTATIONS AND KEYPAD GROUP SUPPORT SYSTEMS - IMPLICATIONS FOR KEYPAD GSS FACILITATORS, Group decision and negotiation, 5(1), 1996, pp. 73-91
Citation: F. Ackermann, PARTICIPANTS PERCEPTIONS ON THE ROLE OF FACILITATORS USING GROUP DECISION-SUPPORT SYSTEMS, Group decision and negotiation, 5(1), 1996, pp. 93-112
Citation: A. Foroughi et al., AN EMPIRICAL-STUDY OF AN INTERACTIVE, SESSION-ORIENTED COMPUTERIZED NEGOTIATION SUPPORT SYSTEM (NSS), Group decision and negotiation, 4(6), 1995, pp. 485-512
Citation: L. Thompson, THE IMPACT OF MINIMUM GOALS AND ASPIRATIONS ON JUDGMENTS OF SUCCESS IN NEGOTIATIONS, Group decision and negotiation, 4(6), 1995, pp. 513-524
Citation: A. Chaudhury, A PROCESS PERSPECTIVE TO DESIGNING INDIVIDUAL NEGOTIATION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, Group decision and negotiation, 4(6), 1995, pp. 525-548
Citation: K. Chatterjee et B. Gray, INTERNATIONAL JOINT VENTURES - ECONOMIC AND ORGANIZATIONAL PERSPECTIVES, Group decision and negotiation, 4(5), 1995, pp. 379-382
Citation: Jm. Geringer et Cp. Woodcock, AGENCY COSTS AND THE STRUCTURE AND PERFORMANCE OF INTERNATIONAL JOINTVENTURES, Group decision and negotiation, 4(5), 1995, pp. 453-467
Citation: De. Klotz et K. Chatterjee, VARIABLE SPLIT AWARDS IN A SINGLE-STAGE PROCUREMENT MODEL, Group decision and negotiation, 4(4), 1995, pp. 295-310
Citation: Mew. Fritz et al., TOWARD A TELEWORK TAXONOMY AND TEST FOR SUITABILITY - A SYNTHESIS OF THE LITERATURE, Group decision and negotiation, 4(4), 1995, pp. 311-334
Citation: Jam. Vennix, BUILDING CONSENSUS IN STRATEGIC DECISION-MAKING - SYSTEM DYNAMICS AS A GROUP SUPPORT SYSTEM, Group decision and negotiation, 4(4), 1995, pp. 335-355
Authors:
KORHONEN P
ORETSKIN N
TEICH J
WALLENIUS J
Citation: P. Korhonen et al., THE IMPACT OF A BIASED STARTING POSITION IN A SINGLE NEGOTIATION TEXTTYPE MEDIATION, Group decision and negotiation, 4(4), 1995, pp. 357-374
Citation: L. Chidambaram et al., INTRODUCTION TO THE SPECIAL ISSUE ON DISTRIBUTED COMMUNICATION-SYSTEMS, Group decision and negotiation, 4(3), 1995, pp. 191-192
Citation: C. Haythornthwaite et al., WORK RELATIONSHIPS AND MEDIA USE - A SOCIAL NETWORK ANALYSIS, Group decision and negotiation, 4(3), 1995, pp. 193-211
Citation: K. Burke et L. Chidambaram, DEVELOPMENTAL DIFFERENCES BETWEEN DISTRIBUTED AND FACE-TO-FACE GROUPSIN ELECTRONICALLY SUPPORTED MEETING ENVIRONMENTS - AN EXPLORATORY INVESTIGATION, Group decision and negotiation, 4(3), 1995, pp. 213-233
Citation: D. Dufner et al., DISTRIBUTED GROUP SUPPORT - THE EFFECTS OF VOTING TOOLS ON GROUP PERCEPTIONS OF MEDIA RICHNESS, Group decision and negotiation, 4(3), 1995, pp. 235-250
Citation: Vs. Rao, EFFECTS OF TELECONFERENCING TECHNOLOGIES - AN EXPLORATION OF COMPREHENSION, FEEDBACK, SATISFACTION AND ROLE-RELATED DIFFERENCES, Group decision and negotiation, 4(3), 1995, pp. 251-272
Citation: Jw. Fellers et Dk. Moon, DISTANCE EDUCATION IN THE FUTURE - EXPLORING THE APPLICATION OF DISTRIBUTED GROUP SUPPORT SYSTEMS, Group decision and negotiation, 4(3), 1995, pp. 273-286
Citation: Gr. Reeves et A. Bordetski, A FRAMEWORK FOR INTERACTIVE MULTIPLE CRITERIA GROUP DECISION-SUPPORT, Group decision and negotiation, 4(2), 1995, pp. 107-115