Citation: Ll. Lewis et Hj. Philips, CHANGES IN THE LAW OF DISPOSITIONS MORTIS-CAUSA FROM THE PRACTITIONERS PERSPECTIVE, Louisiana law review, 57(1), 1996, pp. 167-179
Citation: Le. Balart, CELESTINE V UNION-OIL-COMPANY-OF-CALIFORNIA - REPAIRMEN AND THE UNREASONABLE RISK DETERMINATION IN LOUISIANA STRICT LIABILITY JURISPRUDENCE, Louisiana law review, 57(1), 1996, pp. 267-294
Citation: Gj. Ditta, VILLAGE OF OCONOMOWOC LAKE V DAYTON-HUDSON-CORPORATION - DID THE CLEAN-WATER-ACT OVERLOOK GROUND WATERS, Louisiana law review, 57(1), 1996, pp. 295-310
Citation: Ae. Hardin, CAVALIER V CAINS-HYDROSTATIC-TESTING-INC, QUANTIFICATION OF FAULT PRIOR TO THE 1996 LOUISIANA LEGISLATIVE SPECIAL SESSION, Louisiana law review, 57(1), 1996, pp. 311-336
Citation: Dc. Massey et Ma. Stern, PUNITIVE DAMAGES AND THE LOUISIANA CONSTITUTION - DONT LEAVE HOME WITHOUT IT, Louisiana law review, 56(4), 1996, pp. 743-779
Citation: Jl. Oakes, ARTICLE 2298, THE CODIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPLE FORBIDDING UNJUST ENRICHMENT, AND THE ELIMINATION OF QUANTUM MERUIT AS A BASIS FOR RECOVERYIN LOUISIANA - COMMENT, Louisiana law review, 56(4), 1996, pp. 873-903
Citation: Pa. Burke, UNITED-STATES V X-CITEMENT-VIDEO-INC - STRETCHING THE LIMITS OF STATUTORY INTERPRETATION, Louisiana law review, 56(4), 1996, pp. 937-958
Citation: De. Joubert, MESSAGE IN A BOTTLE - THE UNITED-STATES-SUPREME-COURT DECISION IN VERNONIA SCHOOL-DISTRICT 47J V ACTON, Louisiana law review, 56(4), 1996, pp. 959-979
Citation: Ja. Brown et M. Jones, PRESERVING CONTRIBUTION RIGHTS AFTER SETTLEMENT - A NEED FOR RESOLUTION, Louisiana law review, 56(3), 1996, pp. 511-518
Citation: Tc. Galligan, OF INCIDENTS, ACTIVITIES, AND MARITIME JURISDICTION - A JURISPRUDENTIAL EXEGESIS, Louisiana law review, 56(3), 1996, pp. 519-533