Citation: C. Novelli, SIN, SIGHT, AND SANCTITY IN THE 'MILLERS TALE' - WHY CHAUCER BLACKSMITH WORKS AT NIGHT, The Chaucer review, 33(2), 1998, pp. 168-175
Citation: Rl. Kindrick, HENRYSON UTHER QUAIR AGAIN - A POSSIBLE CANDIDATE AND THE NATURE OF THE TRADITION, The Chaucer review, 33(2), 1998, pp. 190-220
Citation: Rj. Goldstein, TO-SCOTLOND-WARD-HIS-FOOMEN-FOR-TO-SEKE - CHAUCER, THE SCOTS, AND THE'MAN OF LAWS TALE', The Chaucer review, 33(1), 1998, pp. 31-42
Citation: K. Arthur, EQUIVOCAL SUBJECTIVITY IN CHAUCER 'SECOND NUNS PROLOGUE' AND 'TALE' ('CANTERBURY TALES'), The Chaucer review, 32(3), 1998, pp. 217-231
Citation: M. Hallissy, WRITING A BUILDING - CHAUCER KNOWLEDGE OF THE CONSTRUCTION-INDUSTRY AND THE LANGUAGE OF THE 'KNIGHTS TALE' (CHAUCER, 'CANTERBURY TALES'), The Chaucer review, 32(3), 1998, pp. 239-259