Citation: Sw. Howe, THE FAILED CASE FOR 8TH AMENDMENT REGULATION OF THE CAPITAL-SENTENCING TRIAL, University of Pennsylvania law review, 146(3), 1998, pp. 795-863
Citation: R. Delgado, ARE HATE-SPEECH RULES CONSTITUTIONAL HERESY - A REPLY TO GEY,STEVEN, University of Pennsylvania law review, 146(3), 1998, pp. 865-879
Citation: Eh. Grush, THE INEFFICIENCY OF THE NO-DUTY-TO-RESCUE RULE AND A PROPOSED SIMILARRISK ALTERNATIVE, University of Pennsylvania law review, 146(3), 1998, pp. 881-900
Citation: T. Stelzig, DEONTOLOGY, GOVERNMENTAL ACTION, AND THE DISTRIBUTIVE EXEMPTION - HOWTHE TROLLEY PROBLEM SHAPES THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN RIGHTS AND POLICY, University of Pennsylvania law review, 146(3), 1998, pp. 901-959
Citation: Rj. Ross, THE COMMONING OF THE COMMON-LAW - THE RENAISSANCE DEBATE OVER PRINTING ENGLISH LAW, 1520-1640, University of Pennsylvania law review, 146(2), 1998, pp. 323-461
Citation: Ea. Posner, THE PAROL EVIDENCE RULE, THE PLAIN MEANING RULE, AND THE PRINCIPLES OF CONTRACTUAL INTERPRETATION, University of Pennsylvania law review, 146(2), 1998, pp. 533-577
Citation: Ad. Furth, SECULAR IDOLATRY AND SACRED TRADITIONS - A CRITIQUE OF THE SUPREME COURTS SECULARIZATION ANALYSIS, University of Pennsylvania law review, 146(2), 1998, pp. 579-619
Citation: Rh. Miller, 6 OF ONE IS NOT A DOZEN OF THE OTHER - A REEXAMINATION OF WILLIAMS V FLORIDA AND THE SIZE OF STATE CRIMINAL JURIES, University of Pennsylvania law review, 146(2), 1998, pp. 621-686
Citation: Aj. Meese, TYING MEETS THE NEW INSTITUTIONAL ECONOMICS - FAREWELL TO THE CHIMERAOF FORCING, University of Pennsylvania law review, 146(1), 1997, pp. 1-99
Citation: Dc. Langevoort, ORGANIZED ILLUSIONS - A BEHAVIORAL-THEORY OF WHY CORPORATIONS MISLEADSTOCK-MARKET INVESTORS (AND CAUSE OTHER SOCIAL HARMS), University of Pennsylvania law review, 146(1), 1997, pp. 101-172
Citation: Ch. Ruprecht, ARE VERDICTS, TOO, LIKE SAUSAGES - LIFTING THE CLOAK OF JURY SECRECY, University of Pennsylvania law review, 146(1), 1997, pp. 217-267
Citation: Bg. Sweitzer, IMPLICIT REDEFINITIONS, EVIDENTIARY PROSCRIPTIONS, AND GUILTY MINDS -INTOXICATED WRONGDOERS AFTER MONTANA V. EGELHOFF, University of Pennsylvania law review, 146(1), 1997, pp. 269-321
Citation: Br. Clark, ASCERTAINING THE LAWS OF THE SEVERAL STATES - POSITIVISM AND JUDICIALFEDERALISM AFTER ERIE, University of Pennsylvania law review, 145(6), 1997, pp. 1459-1564
Citation: Jlb. Johnson, THE MEANING OF GENERAL LAWS - THE EXTENT OF CONGRESS POWER UNDER THE FULL FAITH AND CREDIT CLAUSE AND THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE DEFENSE OF MARRIAGE ACT, University of Pennsylvania law review, 145(6), 1997, pp. 1611-1647
Citation: Es. Adams et De. Runkle, SOLVING A PROFOUND FLAW IN FRAUD-ON-THE-MARKET THEORY - UTILIZING A DERIVATIVE OF ARBITRAGE PRICING THEORY TO MEASURE RULE B-10-5 DAMAGES, University of Pennsylvania law review, 145(5), 1997, pp. 1097-1145
Citation: Hf. Chang, LIBERALIZED IMMIGRATION AS FREE-TRADE - ECONOMIC WELFARE AND THE OPTIMAL IMMIGRATION POLICY, University of Pennsylvania law review, 145(5), 1997, pp. 1147-1244
Citation: S. Lubet et C. Stewart, A PUBLIC ASSETS THEORY OF LAWYERS PRO BONO OBLIGATIONS, University of Pennsylvania law review, 145(5), 1997, pp. 1245-1307
Citation: R. Heller, SELECTIVE PROSECUTION AND THE FEDERALIZATION OF CRIMINAL-LAW - THE NEED FOR MEANINGFUL JUDICIAL-REVIEW OF PROSECUTORIAL DISCRETION, University of Pennsylvania law review, 145(5), 1997, pp. 1309-1358
Citation: J. Malmud, DEFENDING A SENTENCE - THE JUDICIAL ESTABLISHMENT OF SENTENCING ENTRAPMENT AND SENTENCING MANIPULATION DEFENSES, University of Pennsylvania law review, 145(5), 1997, pp. 1359-1399
Citation: Md. Adler, JUDICIAL RESTRAINT IN THE ADMINISTRATIVE STATE - BEYOND THE COUNTERMAJORITARIAN DIFFICULTY, University of Pennsylvania law review, 145(4), 1997, pp. 759-892