Citation: Mf. Drees, DO STATE LEGISLATURES HAVE A ROLE IN RESOLVING THE JUST COMPENSATION DILEMMA - SOME LESSONS FROM PUBLIC CHOICE AND POSITIVE, POLITICAL-THEORY, Fordham law review, 66(3), 1997, pp. 787-841
Citation: Lm. Padilla, INTERSECTIONALITY AND POSITIONALITY - SITUATING WOMEN OF COLOR IN THEAFFIRMATIVE-ACTION DIALOGUE, Fordham law review, 66(3), 1997, pp. 843-929
Citation: Dn. Hecht, THE LITTLE TRAIN THAT COULDNT - DID THE PENNSYLVANIA ANTITAKEOVER STATUTE FAIL TO PROTECT CONRAIL FROM A HOSTILE SUITOR, Fordham law review, 66(3), 1997, pp. 931-974
Citation: Jb. Pape, PHYSICIAN DATA-BANKS - THE PUBLICS RIGHT-TO-KNOW VERSUS THE PHYSICIANS RIGHT TO PRIVACY, Fordham law review, 66(3), 1997, pp. 975-1028
Citation: T. Scarola, CREATING PROBLEMS RATHER THAN SOLVING THEM - WHY CRIMINAL PARENTAL RESPONSIBILITY LAWS DO NOT FIT WITHIN OUR UNDERSTANDING OF JUSTICE, Fordham law review, 66(3), 1997, pp. 1029-1074
Citation: Ca. Bradley et Jl. Goldsmith, THE CURRENT ILLEGITIMACY OF INTERNATIONAL HUMAN-RIGHTS LITIGATION, Fordham law review, 66(2), 1997, pp. 319-369
Citation: Gl. Neuman, SENSE AND NONSENSE ABOUT CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL-LAW - A RESPONSE TO PROFESSORS BRADLEY AND GOLDSMITH, Fordham law review, 66(2), 1997, pp. 371-392
Citation: R. Goodman et Dp. Jinks, FILARTIGAS FIRM FOOTING - INTERNATIONAL HUMAN-RIGHTS AND FEDERAL COMMON-LAW, Fordham law review, 66(2), 1997, pp. 463-529
Citation: M. Posner, FOREWORD - HUMAN-RIGHTS AND NONGOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS ON THE EVE OF THE NEXT CENTURY, Fordham law review, 66(2), 1997, pp. 627-630
Citation: Kh. Ching, INDIGENOUS SELF-DETERMINATION IN AN AGE OF GENETIC PATENTING - RECOGNIZING AN EMERGING HUMAN-RIGHTS NORM, Fordham law review, 66(2), 1997, pp. 687-730
Citation: Pl. Crocker, CONCEPTS OF CULPABILITY AND DEATHWORTHINESS - DIFFERENTIATING BETWEENGUILT AND PUNISHMENT IN DEATH-PENALTY CASES, Fordham law review, 66(1), 1997, pp. 21-86