AAAAAA
Results: 201-225/365
Authors:
ZACHARIAS FC
Citation: Fc. Zacharias, WHO CAN BEST REGULATE THE ETHICS OF FEDERAL PROSECUTORS, OR, WHO SHOULD REGULATE THE REGULATORS - RESPONSE, Fordham law review, 65(1), 1996, pp. 429-463
Authors:
WILKINS DB
Citation: Db. Wilkins, HOW SHOULD WE DETERMINE WHO SHOULD REGULATE LAWYERS - MANAGING-CONFLICT AND CONTEXT IN PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, Fordham law review, 65(1), 1996, pp. 465-492
Authors:
MCFARLAND DN
Citation: Dn. Mcfarland, BEYOND SEX-DISCRIMINATION - A PROPOSAL FOR FEDERAL SEXUAL HARASSMENT LEGISLATION, Fordham law review, 65(1), 1996, pp. 493-542
Authors:
WOOD GS
Citation: Gs. Wood, JEFFERSON,THOMAS, EQUALITY, AND THE CREATION OF A CIVIL-SOCIETY, Fordham law review, 64(5), 1996, pp. 2133-2147
Authors:
BUTLER SC
Citation: Sc. Butler, SOME THOUGHTS ON CIVIL JUSTICE REFORM, Fordham law review, 64(5), 1996, pp. 2149-2153
Authors:
YOUNG MR
Citation: Mr. Young, THE LIABILITY OF CORPORATE OFFICIALS TO THEIR OUTSIDE AUDITOR FOR FINANCIAL STATEMENT FRAUD, Fordham law review, 64(5), 1996, pp. 2155-2184
Authors:
MAXEY A
Citation: A. Maxey, COMPETING DUTIES - SECURITIES LAWYERS LIABILITY AFTER CENTRAL BANK, Fordham law review, 64(5), 1996, pp. 2185-2239
Authors:
CICIA AC
Citation: Ac. Cicia, A WOLF IN SHEEPS CLOTHING - A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF JUSTICE HARLANS SUBSTANTIVE DUE-PROCESS FORMULATION, Fordham law review, 64(5), 1996, pp. 2241-2284
Authors:
DREYER AJ
Citation: Aj. Dreyer, WHEN THE POSTMAN BEEPS TWICE - THE ADMISSIBILITY OF ELECTRONIC MAIL UNDER THE BUSINESS RECORDS EXCEPTION OF THE FEDERAL-RULES OF EVIDENCE, Fordham law review, 64(5), 1996, pp. 2285-2328
Authors:
JOHNSON HM
Citation: Hm. Johnson, RESOLUTION OF MASS PRODUCT LIABILITY LITIGATION WITHIN THE FEDERAL-RULES - A CASE FOR THE INCREASED USE OF RULE 23(B)(3) CLASS-ACTIONS, Fordham law review, 64(5), 1996, pp. 2329-2379
Authors:
OWEN DR
Citation: Dr. Owen, INTERFACES AND INTEROPERABILITY IN LOTUS V BORLAND - A MARKET-ORIENTED APPROACH TO THE FAIR-USE DOCTRINE, Fordham law review, 64(5), 1996, pp. 2381-2423
Authors:
SABO S
Citation: S. Sabo, RIGHTS OF PASSAGE - AN ANALYSIS OF WAIVER OF JUVENILE-COURT JURISDICTION, Fordham law review, 64(5), 1996, pp. 2425-2454
Authors:
HORMAN TJ
Citation: Tj. Horman, IN DEFENSE OF UNITED-STATES V BRYAN - WHY THE MISAPPROPRIATION THEORYIS INDEFENSIBLE, Fordham law review, 64(5), 1996, pp. 2455-2506
Authors:
FEERICK JD
Citation: Jd. Feerick, IN MEMORY OF A WONDERFUL FRIEND, Fordham law review, 64(4), 1996, pp. 1280-1280
Authors:
GREEN BA
DOHRN B
Citation: Ba. Green et B. Dohrn, FOREWORD - CHILDREN AND THE ETHICAL PRACTICE OF LAW, Fordham law review, 64(4), 1996, pp. 1281-1298
Citation: RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE CONFERENCE ON ETHICAL ISSUES IN THE LEGAL REPRESENTATION OF CHILDREN, Fordham law review, 64(4), 1996, pp. 1301-1323
Authors:
DOHRN B
LURVEY I
MOHR P
ELDER N
FINK J
GUGGENHEIM M
MATTHEWS M
MOYNIHAN A
ROLLIN M
ROSS C
SHERMAN C
SHEPHERD R
Citation: B. Dohrn et al., REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON THE ALLOCATION OF DECISION-MAKING, Fordham law review, 64(4), 1996, pp. 1325-1337
Authors:
BELL J
QUINN N
MARGULIES P
DABIRI G
DEMARCO A
ELROD L
HERMAN S
MORALES J
SABATINO C
SALGO L
STRAND V
WALKER T
Citation: J. Bell et al., REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON DETERMINING THE CHILDS CAPACITY TO MAKE DECISIONS, Fordham law review, 64(4), 1996, pp. 1339-1345
Authors:
SCHWARTZ R
GLASER D
CERVONE F
CORRIERO M
DUNN C
EFFRON E
FIRESTEIN R
HARALAMBIE A
LEVINE D
PETERS JK
SPINAK J
ZAYAS L
Citation: R. Schwartz et al., REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON DETERMINING THE BEST INTEREST OF THE CHILD, Fordham law review, 64(4), 1996, pp. 1347-1350
Authors:
PEARCE R
HERMAN G
BUSS E
CHAPLAN J
COHEN L
FEDERLE KH
GRASSO K
LERNER G
LINDSEY M
MAURO L
Citation: R. Pearce et al., REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON INTERVIEWING AND COUNSELING, Fordham law review, 64(4), 1996, pp. 1351-1366
Authors:
DAVIS A
BOYER B
SALKA F
BARNETT H
KATNER D
LARSEN J
MANDELBAUM RS
MULHAUSER T
RYAN K
STUCKEY R
Citation: A. Davis et al., REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON CONFIDENTIALITY, Fordham law review, 64(4), 1996, pp. 1367-1377
Authors:
MANNING D
GREEN B
KAUFMAN B
APPELL A
DAVIS N
HOFSTETLER Z
MOORE N
RICHTER R
ROSNER S
WU C
Citation: D. Manning et al., REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON CONFLICTS-OF-INTEREST, Fordham law review, 64(4), 1996, pp. 1379-1388
Authors:
LEWIS KM
LIPSEY H
DAVIDSON H
DUNLAP J
FUENTES J
HAYDEN KS
JOHNS K
LEVY R
MLYNIEC DW
SCHWARTZ B
SHINK S
Citation: Km. Lewis et al., REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON THE JUDICIAL ROLE, Fordham law review, 64(4), 1996, pp. 1389-1393
Authors:
GUGGENHEIM M
Citation: M. Guggenheim, A PARADIGM FOR DETERMINING THE ROLE OF COUNSEL FOR CHILDREN, Fordham law review, 64(4), 1996, pp. 1399-1433
Authors:
MATTHEWS M
Citation: M. Matthews, 10,000 TINY CLIENTS - THE ETHICAL DUTY OF REPRESENTATION IN CHILDRENSCLASS-ACTION CASES, Fordham law review, 64(4), 1996, pp. 1435-1471