Citation: Jk. Peters, THE ROLES AND CONTENT OF BEST INTERESTS IN CLIENT-DIRECTED LAWYERING FOR CHILDREN IN CHILD PROTECTIVE PROCEEDINGS, Fordham law review, 64(4), 1996, pp. 1505-1570
Citation: Kh. Federle, THE ETHICS OF EMPOWERMENT - RETHINKING THE ROLE OF LAWYERS IN INTERVIEWING AND COUNSELING THE CHILD CLIENT, Fordham law review, 64(4), 1996, pp. 1655-1697
Citation: Rt. Stuckey, GUARDIANS AD-LITEM AS SURROGATE PARENTS - IMPLICATIONS FOR ROLE DEFINITION AND CONFIDENTIALITY, Fordham law review, 64(4), 1996, pp. 1785-1818
Citation: Ar. Appell, DECONTEXTUALIZING THE CHILD CLIENT - THE EFFICACY OF THE ATTORNEY-CLIENT MODEL FOR VERY YOUNG-CHILDREN, Fordham law review, 64(4), 1996, pp. 1955-1973
Citation: Fp. Cervone et Lm. Mauro, ETHICS, CULTURES, AND PROFESSIONS IN THE REPRESENTATION OF CHILDREN, Fordham law review, 64(4), 1996, pp. 1975-1990
Citation: C. Dunn, THE ETHICAL LEGITIMACY OF CLASS-ACTION, INSTITUTIONAL-REFORM LITIGATION ON BEHALF OF CHILDREN - A RESPONSE TO MATTHEWS,MARTHA, Fordham law review, 64(4), 1996, pp. 1991-1998
Citation: Ld. Elrod, AN ANALYSIS OF THE PROPOSED STANDARDS OF PRACTICE FOR LAWYERS REPRESENTING CHILDREN IN ABUSE AND NEGLECT CASES, Fordham law review, 64(4), 1996, pp. 1999-2011
Citation: J. Larsen, CONFIDENTIALITY - DOES THE BAR HAVE AN OBLIGATION TO HELP CLOSE AN EVIDENTIARY GAP, Fordham law review, 64(4), 1996, pp. 2019-2021
Citation: D. Levine, TO ASSERT CHILDRENS LEGAL-RIGHTS OR PROMOTE CHILDRENS NEEDS - HOW TO ATTAIN BOTH GOALS, Fordham law review, 64(4), 1996, pp. 2023-2033
Citation: Ml. Lindsey, ETHICAL ISSUES IN INTERVIEWING, COUNSELING, AND THE USE OF PSYCHOLOGICAL DATA WITH CHILD AND ADOLESCENT CLIENTS, Fordham law review, 64(4), 1996, pp. 2035-2052
Citation: R. Mandelbaum, RULES OF CONFIDENTIALITY WHEN REPRESENTING CHILDREN - THE NEED FOR A BRIGHT LINE TEST, Fordham law review, 64(4), 1996, pp. 2053-2064
Citation: Km. Ryan, REFORMING MODEL-RULE-1.6 - A BRIEF ESSAY FROM THE CROSSROADS OF ETHICS AND CONSCIENCE, Fordham law review, 64(4), 1996, pp. 2065-2074
Citation: Sd. Hawkins, PROTECTING THE RIGHTS AND INTERESTS OF COMPETENT MINORS IN LITIGATED MEDICAL-TREATMENT DISPUTES, Fordham law review, 64(4), 1996, pp. 2075-2132
Citation: Tl. Meares, REWARDS FOR GOOD BEHAVIOR - INFLUENCING PROSECUTORIAL DISCRETION AND CONDUCT WITH FINANCIAL INCENTIVES, Fordham law review, 64(3), 1995, pp. 851-919