AAAAAA
Results: 26-50/207
Authors:
BARRETT PJ
Citation: Pj. Barrett, YOUNG,EDWARD,T. STILL LIVING THE GOOD LIFE - COEUR-DALENE TRIBE V. IDAHO, The Notre Dame law review, 73(4), 1998, pp. 1077-1117
Authors:
KROMKOWSKI MA
VANHANDEL JJ
Citation: Ma. Kromkowski et Jj. Vanhandel, THE COLLATERAL ORDER DOCTRINE AS APPLIED TO DISCOVERY REQUESTS - THE 3RD-CIRCUIT KELLY V. FORD-MOTOR-CO. (IN-RE FORD-MOTOR-CO.), The Notre Dame law review, 73(4), 1998, pp. 1119-1134
Authors:
ZELENSKY E
Citation: E. Zelensky, NEW BULLY ON THE CLASS-ACTION BLOCK - ANALYSIS OF RESTRICTIONS ON SECURITIES CLASS-ACTIONS IMPOSED BY THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995, The Notre Dame law review, 73(4), 1998, pp. 1135-1151
Authors:
FINNIS J
Citation: J. Finnis, ON THE PRACTICAL MEANING OF SECULARISM, The Notre Dame law review, 73(3), 1998, pp. 491-516
Authors:
ALEXANDER L
Citation: L. Alexander, THE BANALITY OF LEGAL REASONING, The Notre Dame law review, 73(3), 1998, pp. 517-533
Authors:
ALLEN LE
Citation: Le. Allen, SOME EXAMPLES OF USING THE LEGAL RELATIONS LANGUAGE IN THE LEGAL DOMAIN - APPLIED DEONTIC LOGIC, The Notre Dame law review, 73(3), 1998, pp. 535-574
Authors:
FRIEDMAN RD
Citation: Rd. Friedman, LOGIC AND ELEMENTS, The Notre Dame law review, 73(3), 1998, pp. 575-601
Authors:
POSPESEL H
Citation: H. Pospesel, TOWARD A LEGAL DEONTIC LOGIC, The Notre Dame law review, 73(3), 1998, pp. 603-626
Authors:
RODES RE
Citation: Re. Rodes, DE RE AND DE DICTO, The Notre Dame law review, 73(3), 1998, pp. 627-636
Authors:
ROGERS JM
Citation: Jm. Rogers, INTENSIONAL CONTEXTS AND THE RULE THAT STATUTES SHOULD BE INTERPRETEDAS CONSISTENT WITH INTERNATIONAL-LAW, The Notre Dame law review, 73(3), 1998, pp. 637-666
Authors:
SAUNDERS KW
Citation: Kw. Saunders, WHAT LOGIC CAN AND CANNOT TELL US ABOUT LAW, The Notre Dame law review, 73(3), 1998, pp. 667-688
Authors:
SAYRE P
Citation: P. Sayre, SOCRATES IS MORTAL - FORMAL LOGIC AND THE PRELAW UNDERGRADUATE, The Notre Dame law review, 73(3), 1998, pp. 689-709
Authors:
WALTON DN
Citation: Dn. Walton, A PRAGMATIC MODEL OF LEGAL DISPUTATION, The Notre Dame law review, 73(3), 1998, pp. 711-735
Authors:
SHAFFER TL
Citation: Tl. Shaffer, THE CHRISTIAN JURISPRUDENCE OF RODES,ROBERT,E., JR, The Notre Dame law review, 73(3), 1998, pp. 737-772
Authors:
POWERS GF
Citation: Gf. Powers, IN-MEMORIAM FOR FR. LEWERS,WILLIAM, CSC, The Notre Dame law review, 73(3), 1998, pp. 775-776
Authors:
MEINTJES GF
Citation: Gf. Meintjes, DYING WITH STYLE AND GRACE - FATHER LEWERS,BILL, The Notre Dame law review, 73(3), 1998, pp. 777-779
Authors:
BATEY R
Citation: R. Batey, CRIMINAL-LAW - ROBINSON,PH, The Notre Dame law review, 73(3), 1998, pp. 781-817
Authors:
BARRETT JM
Citation: Jm. Barrett, LEGISLATIVE HISTORY, THE NEUTRAL, DISPASSIONATE JUDGE, AND LEGISLATIVE SUPREMACY - PRESERVING THE LATTER IDEALS THROUGH THE FORMER TOOL, The Notre Dame law review, 73(3), 1998, pp. 819-837
Authors:
PODOLEFSKY RL
Citation: Rl. Podolefsky, THE ILLUSION OF SUFFRAGE - FEMALE VOTING-RIGHTS AND THE WOMENS POLL TAX REPEAL MOVEMENT AFTER THE 19TH-AMENDMENT (REPRINTED FROM COLUMBIA-JOURNAL-OF-GENDER-AND-LAW, VOL 7, PG 185, 1998), The Notre Dame law review, 73(3), 1998, pp. 839-888
Authors:
BROWN GD
Citation: Gd. Brown, STEALTH STATUTE - CORRUPTION, THE SPENDING POWER, AND THE RISE OF 18-USC-666, The Notre Dame law review, 73(2), 1998, pp. 247-313
Authors:
CRESPI GS
Citation: Gs. Crespi, EXPLORING THE COMPLICATIONIST GAMBIT - AN AUSTRIAN APPROACH TO THE ECONOMIC-ANALYSIS OF LAW, The Notre Dame law review, 73(2), 1998, pp. 315-383
Authors:
CUEVAS CJ
Citation: Cj. Cuevas, THE MYTH OF FIDUCIARY DUTIES IN CORPORATE REORGANIZATION CASES, The Notre Dame law review, 73(2), 1998, pp. 385-417
Authors:
RIPPLE RM
Citation: Rm. Ripple, TRANSNATIONAL LITIGATION - TEITZ,LE, The Notre Dame law review, 73(2), 1998, pp. 419-432
Authors:
EVANS JM
Citation: Jm. Evans, DONT THROW ME INTO THE BRIAR PATCH - RICO AND RULES OF EVIDENCE, The Notre Dame law review, 73(2), 1998, pp. 433-460
Authors:
HORVATH KF
Citation: Kf. Horvath, NBA V. MOTOROLA - A CASE FOR FEDERAL PREEMPTION OF MISAPPROPRIATION, The Notre Dame law review, 73(2), 1998, pp. 461-490