AAAAAA
Results: 51-75/207
Authors:
STRAZZELLA JA
Citation: Ja. Strazzella, THE RELATIONSHIP OF DOUBLE JEOPARDY TO PROSECUTION APPEALS, The Notre Dame law review, 73(1), 1997, pp. 1-30
Authors:
LEROY MH
Citation: Mh. Leroy, DEALING WITH EMPLOYEE INVOLVEMENT IN NONUNION WORKPLACES - EMPIRICAL-RESEARCH IMPLICATIONS FOR THE TEAM ACT AND ELECTROMATION, The Notre Dame law review, 73(1), 1997, pp. 31-82
Authors:
REPPY WA
Citation: Wa. Reppy, JUDICIAL OVERKILL IN APPLYING THE RULE IN SHELLEYS CASE, The Notre Dame law review, 73(1), 1997, pp. 83-172
Authors:
FORT TL
Citation: Tl. Fort, THE CORPORATION AS MEDIATING INSTITUTION - AN EFFICACIOUS SYNTHESIS OF STAKEHOLDER THEORY AND CORPORATE CONSTITUENCY STATUTES, The Notre Dame law review, 73(1), 1997, pp. 173-203
Authors:
BRODEN TF
Citation: Tf. Broden, IN MEMORY OF PROFESSOR BRODERICK,JOHN, The Notre Dame law review, 73(1), 1997, pp. 205
Authors:
ALBERT JA
Citation: Ja. Albert, FAREWELL TO THE CHIEF, The Notre Dame law review, 73(1), 1997, pp. 209-212
Authors:
FEERICK JD
Citation: Jd. Feerick, ON CONSTITUTIONAL GROUND - ELY,JH, The Notre Dame law review, 73(1), 1997, pp. 213-232
Authors:
SAFRANEK SJ
Citation: Sj. Safranek, THE THEME IS FREEDOM - EVANS,MS, The Notre Dame law review, 73(1), 1997, pp. 233-245
Authors:
SCHAUER F
Citation: F. Schauer, DISCOURSE AND ITS DISCONTENTS, The Notre Dame law review, 72(5), 1997, pp. 1309-1341
Authors:
BLASI V
Citation: V. Blasi, READING HOLMES THROUGH THE LENS OF SCHAUER - THE ABRAMS-DISSENT, The Notre Dame law review, 72(5), 1997, pp. 1343-1360
Authors:
ESTLUND CL
Citation: Cl. Estlund, THE ARCHITECTURE OF THE FIRST-AMENDMENT AND THE CASE OF WORKPLACE HARASSMENT, The Notre Dame law review, 72(5), 1997, pp. 1361-1389
Authors:
FALLON RH
Citation: Rh. Fallon, RUMINATIONS ON THE WORK OF SCHAUER,FREDERICK, The Notre Dame law review, 72(5), 1997, pp. 1391-1414
Authors:
GILLETTE CP
Citation: Cp. Gillette, RULES AND REVERSIBILITY, The Notre Dame law review, 72(5), 1997, pp. 1415-1448
Authors:
GREENAWALT K
Citation: K. Greenawalt, THE NATURE OF RULES AND THE MEANING OF MEANING, The Notre Dame law review, 72(5), 1997, pp. 1449-1477
Authors:
GREENE AS
Citation: As. Greene, THE WORK OF KNOWLEDGE, The Notre Dame law review, 72(5), 1997, pp. 1479-1494
Authors:
NAGLE JC
Citation: Jc. Nagle, DELAWARE AND HUDSON REVISITED, The Notre Dame law review, 72(5), 1997, pp. 1495-1518
Authors:
POWE LA
Citation: La. Powe, SITUATING SCHAUER, The Notre Dame law review, 72(5), 1997, pp. 1519-1538
Authors:
SEBOK AJ
Citation: Aj. Sebok, IS THE RULE OF RECOGNITION A RULE, The Notre Dame law review, 72(5), 1997, pp. 1539-1563
Authors:
STRAUSS DA
Citation: Da. Strauss, WHY PLAIN MEANING, The Notre Dame law review, 72(5), 1997, pp. 1565-1582
Authors:
TUSHNET M
Citation: M. Tushnet, SELF-FORMALISM, PRECEDENT, AND THE RULE OF LAW, The Notre Dame law review, 72(5), 1997, pp. 1583-1595
Authors:
PAULSEN MS
Citation: Ms. Paulsen, WHAT ARE FREEDOMS FOR - GARVEY,JH, The Notre Dame law review, 72(5), 1997, pp. 1597-1626
Authors:
SOLOMON PA
Citation: Pa. Solomon, ARE MANDATORY CLASS-ACTIONS UNCONSTITUTIONAL, The Notre Dame law review, 72(5), 1997, pp. 1627-1646
Authors:
SCAVETTA JF
Citation: Jf. Scavetta, RCRA-101 - A COURSE IN COMPLIANCE FOR COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES, The Notre Dame law review, 72(5), 1997, pp. 1647-1678
Authors:
DEZELAN DE
Citation: De. Dezelan, DEPARTURES FROM THE FEDERAL-SENTENCING-GUIDELINES AFTER KOON-V-UNITED-STATES - MORE DISCRETION, LESS DIRECTION, The Notre Dame law review, 72(5), 1997, pp. 1679-1721
Authors:
ALLISON B
Citation: B. Allison, A PERSON OR A LAWYER, The Notre Dame law review, 72(5), 1997, pp. 1723-1751