Citation: Ja. Orefice, NONTAXABLE PURCHASE-PRICE REDUCTION VERSUS TAXABLE DISPOSITION - THE INTERPLAY BETWEEN SECTIONS 108(E)(5) AND 453B(F), Journal of corporate taxation, 20(1), 1993, pp. 43-77
Citation: Jd. Bridgeman, THE PROPOSED SECTION-338 REGULATIONS - SOME GOOD-NEWS FROM GENERAL-UTILITIES REPEAL, Journal of corporate taxation, 19(4), 1993, pp. 283-300
Citation: Rs. Agar et Mp. Tracy, SIDESTEPPING THE BUSINESS PURPOSE TEST FOR CORPORATE SPIN-OFFS, Journal of corporate taxation, 19(4), 1993, pp. 301-310
Citation: Ko. Keeling et Am. Sedaghat, DECODING THE UNIFORM CAPITALIZATION REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO MANUFACTURERS, Journal of corporate taxation, 19(4), 1993, pp. 311-338
Citation: Ra. Rizzi, TO B OR NOT TO B - DISTINCTIONS BETWEEN B AND REVERSE TRIANGULAR REORGANIZATIONS DEFY LOGIC BUT PROVIDE FLEXIBILITY IN RESTRUCTURING, Journal of corporate taxation, 19(4), 1993, pp. 339-345
Citation: Sc. Budinger, EXCLUSIONS FROM INCOME FOR QUALIFIED INDIVIDUALS EMPLOYED OUTSIDE THEUNITED-STATES, Journal of corporate taxation, 19(4), 1993, pp. 346-353
Citation: Cw. Friedrich, SUPREME-COURT HOLDS COMMERCE CLAUSE, BUT NOT DUE-PROCESS CLAUSE, PRECLUDES REQUIRING OUT-OF-STATE VENDORS TO COLLECT USE TAX, Journal of corporate taxation, 19(4), 1993, pp. 370-376