Citation: P. Kennedy et Wb. Walstad, COMBINING MULTIPLE-CHOICE AND CONSTRUCTED-RESPONSE TEST-SCORES - AN ECONOMISTS VIEW, Applied measurement in education, 10(4), 1997, pp. 359-375
Citation: H. Wainer et R. Lukhele, MANAGING THE INFLUENCE OF DIF FROM BIG ITEMS - THE 1988 ADVANCED PLACEMENT HISTORY TEST AS AN EXAMPLE, Applied measurement in education, 10(3), 1997, pp. 201-215
Citation: Ew. Wolfe et Tr. Miller, BARRIERS TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT IN SECONDARY-EDUCATION, Applied measurement in education, 10(3), 1997, pp. 235-251
Citation: Tq. Han et al., A COMPARISON AMONG IRT TRUE-SCORE AND OBSERVED-SCORE EQUATINGS AND TRADITIONAL EQUIPERCENTILE EQUATING, Applied measurement in education, 10(2), 1997, pp. 105-121
Citation: S. Ferrara et al., CONTEXTUAL CHARACTERISTICS OF LOCALLY DEPENDENT OPEN-ENDED ITEM CLUSTERS IN A LARGE-SCALE PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT, Applied measurement in education, 10(2), 1997, pp. 123-144
Citation: K. Ercikan, LINKING STATEWIDE TESTS TO THE NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF EDUCATIONAL-PROGRESS - ACCURACY OF COMBINING TEST-RESULTS ACROSS STATES, Applied measurement in education, 10(2), 1997, pp. 145-159
Citation: Sm. Brookhart, A THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK FOR THE ROLE OF CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT IN MOTIVATING STUDENT EFFORT AND ACHIEVEMENT, Applied measurement in education, 10(2), 1997, pp. 161-180
Citation: Rk. Hambleton et Sc. Slater, RELIABILITY OF CREDENTIALING EXAMINATIONS AND THE IMPACT OF SCORING MODELS AND STANDARD-SETTING POLICIES, Applied measurement in education, 10(1), 1997, pp. 19-38
Citation: Sm. Downing et Tm. Haladyna, TEST ITEM DEVELOPMENT - VALIDITY EVIDENCE FROM QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCEDURES, Applied measurement in education, 10(1), 1997, pp. 61-82
Citation: L. Crocker, ASSESSING CONTENT REPRESENTATIVENESS OF PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT EXERCISES, Applied measurement in education, 10(1), 1997, pp. 83-95
Citation: Wa. Mehrens, VALIDATING LICENSING AND CERTIFICATION TEST SCORE INTERPRETATIONS ANDDECISIONS - A RESPONSE, Applied measurement in education, 10(1), 1997, pp. 97-104
Citation: Ba. Hanson, TESTING FOR DIFFERENCES IN TEST SCORE DISTRIBUTIONS USING LOGLINEAR MODELS, Applied measurement in education, 9(4), 1996, pp. 305-321
Citation: J. Tognolini et D. Andrich, ANALYSIS OF PROFILES OF STUDENTS APPLYING FOR ENTRANCE TO UNIVERSITIES, Applied measurement in education, 9(4), 1996, pp. 323-353
Citation: Rl. Linn et al., GENERALIZABILITY OF NEW STANDARDS PROJECT 1993 PILOT-STUDY TASKS IN MATHEMATICS, Applied measurement in education, 9(3), 1996, pp. 201-214
Citation: Ra. Berk, STANDARD-SETTING - THE NEXT-GENERATION (WHERE FEW PSYCHOMETRICIANS HAVE GONE BEFORE), Applied measurement in education, 9(3), 1996, pp. 215-235