Citation: Mj. Press, ARBITRATION OF CLAIMS UNDER THE SECURITIES-EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 - IS EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION STILL JUSTIFIED, Boston University law review, 77(3), 1997, pp. 629-654
Citation: Km. Hamill, ROMER V. EVANS - DULLING THE EQUAL-PROTECTION GLOSS ON BOWERS V. HARDWICK, Boston University law review, 77(3), 1997, pp. 655-685
Citation: Ch. Pyle, WOMENS COLLEGES - IS SEGREGATION BY SEX STILL JUSTIFIABLE AFTER UNITED-STATES V. VIRGINIA, Boston University law review, 77(2), 1997, pp. 209-271
Citation: Al. Feld et Sg. Marks, LEGAL DIFFERENCES WITHOUT ECONOMIC DISTINCTIONS - POINTS, PENALTIES, AND THE MARKET FOR MORTGAGES, Boston University law review, 77(2), 1997, pp. 405-420
Citation: Ee. Ruddick, THE CONTINUING CONSTRAINT OF SOVEREIGNTY - INTERNATIONAL-LAW, INTERNATIONAL PROTECTION, AND THE INTERNALLY DISPLACED, Boston University law review, 77(2), 1997, pp. 429-482
Citation: Pc. Crosby, CUSTODY OF VAUGHN - EMPHASIZING THE IMPORTANCE OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN CHILD-CUSTODY CASES, Boston University law review, 77(2), 1997, pp. 483-513
Citation: Rs. Thomas et Kj. Martin, USING STATE INSPECTION STATUTES FOR DISCOVERY IN FEDERAL SECURITIES FRAUD ACTIONS, Boston University law review, 77(1), 1997, pp. 69-107
Citation: Te. Chapman, TO SAVE AND SAVE NOT - THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION IMPLICATIONS OF THE PROPERTY-RIGHTS MOVEMENT, Boston University law review, 77(1), 1997, pp. 111-150
Citation: L. Friedman et New. Delker, THE FROZEN REPUBLIC - HOW THE CONSTITUTION IS PARALYZING DEMOCRACY - LAZARE,D, Boston University law review, 76(5), 1996, pp. 1019-1049
Citation: Jm. Dowd, OLIGOPSONY POWER - ANTITRUST INJURY AND COLLUSIVE BUYER PRACTICES IN INPUT MARKETS, Boston University law review, 76(5), 1996, pp. 1075-1117
Citation: Ms. Mcusic, THE GHOST OF LOCHNER - MODERN TAKINGS DOCTRINE AND ITS IMPACT ON ECONOMIC LEGISLATION, Boston University law review, 76(4), 1996, pp. 605-667