Citation: Mc. Bertron, HOME IS WHERE YOUR MODEM IS - AN APPROPRIATE APPLICATION OF SEARCH AND SEIZURE LAW TO ELECTRONIC MAIL, The American criminal law review, 34(1), 1996, pp. 163-195
Citation: Am. Kobayashi, INTERNATIONAL AND DOMESTIC APPROACHES TO CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTIONS OF INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS - RECONCILING THE SOERING AND KINDLER DECISIONS, The American criminal law review, 34(1), 1996, pp. 225-259
Citation: C. Roush, WARRANTLESS PUBLIC-HOUSING SEARCHES - INDIVIDUAL VIOLATIONS OR COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS, The American criminal law review, 34(1), 1996, pp. 261-288
Citation: C. Turner, WHATS THE STORY - AN ANALYSIS OF JUROR DISCRIMINATION AND A PLEA FOR AFFIRMATIVE JURY SELECTION, The American criminal law review, 34(1), 1996, pp. 289-323
Citation: Gr. Blakey et Kp. Roddy, REFLECTIONS ON REVES-V-ERNST-AND-YOUNG - ITS MEANING AND IMPACT ON SUBSTANTIVE, ACCESSORY, AIDING ABETTING AND CONSPIRACY LIABILITY UNDER RICO, The American criminal law review, 33(5), 1996, pp. 1345-1702
Citation: O. Shweiki, ENVIRONMENTAL AUDIT PRIVILEGE AND VOLUNTARY DISCLOSURE RULE - THE IMPORTANCE OF FEDERAL ENACTMENT, The American criminal law review, 33(4), 1996, pp. 1219-1249
Citation: Je. Davis, LAW OFFICE SEARCHES - THE ASSAULT ON CONFIDENTIALITY AND THE ADVERSARY SYSTEM, The American criminal law review, 33(4), 1996, pp. 1251-1275
Citation: Tm. Myers, RECIPROCAL DISCOVERY VIOLATIONS - VISITING THE SINS OF THE DEFENSE LAWYER ON THE INNOCENT CLIENT, The American criminal law review, 33(4), 1996, pp. 1277-1298
Citation: Jm. Oconnor et Lk. Treat, GETTING SMART ABOUT GETTING TOUGH - JUVENILE JUSTICE AND THE POSSIBILITY OF PROGRESSIVE REFORM, The American criminal law review, 33(4), 1996, pp. 1299-1344
Citation: M. Angel, CRIMINAL-LAW AND WOMEN - GIVING THE ABUSED WOMAN WHO KILLS A JURY OF HER PEERS WHO APPRECIATE TRIFLES, The American criminal law review, 33(2), 1996, pp. 229-348
Citation: Mk. Forde, THE EXCLUSIONARY-RULE AT SENTENCING - NEW LIFE UNDER THE FEDERAL SENTENCING GUIDELINES, The American criminal law review, 33(2), 1996, pp. 379-409
Citation: Jj. Misrahi, FACTORIES WITH FENCES - AN ANALYSIS OF THE PRISON INDUSTRY ENHANCEMENT CERTIFICATION PROGRAM IN HISTORICAL-PERSPECTIVE, The American criminal law review, 33(2), 1996, pp. 411-436
Citation: Da. Rudolph, THE MISGUIDED RELIANCE IN AMERICAN JURISPRUDENCE ON JEWISH LAW TO SUPPORT THE MORAL LEGITIMACY OF CAPITAL-PUNISHMENT, The American criminal law review, 33(2), 1996, pp. 437-462
Citation: Sl. Pilcher, IGNORANCE, DISCRETION AND THE FAIRNESS OF NOTICE - CONFRONTING APPARENT INNOCENCE IN THE CRIMINAL-LAW, The American criminal law review, 33(1), 1995, pp. 1-55
Citation: Dc. Brody, SPARF AND DOUGHERTY REVISITED - WHY THE COURT SHOULD INSTRUCT THE JURY OF ITS NULLIFICATION RIGHT, The American criminal law review, 33(1), 1995, pp. 89-122
Citation: G. Dibianco, TRULY CONSTITUTIONAL - THE AMERICAN DOUBLE JEOPARDY CLAUSE AND ITS AUSTRALIAN ANALOGS, The American criminal law review, 33(1), 1995, pp. 123-163