Citation: T. Connors, BELEAGUERED ACCOUNTING - SHOULD THE FILM INDUSTRY ABANDON ITS NET PROFITS FORMULA, Southern California law review, 70(3), 1997, pp. 841-919
Citation: Sa. Gartner, STRIP-SEARCHES OF STUDENTS - WHAT JOHNNY REALLY LEARNED AT SCHOOL ANDHOW LOCAL SCHOOL-BOARDS CAN HELP SOLVE THE PROBLEM, Southern California law review, 70(3), 1997, pp. 921-978
Citation: J. Pae, THE EMASCULATION OF COMPELLED TESTIMONY - BATTLING THE EFFECTS OF JUDICIALLY IMPOSED LIMITATIONS ON GRAND JURY INVESTIGATIONS OF TERRORISM AND OTHER IDEOLOGICAL CRIMES, Southern California law review, 70(2), 1997, pp. 473-516
Citation: Gy. Porter, UNCIVIL PUNISHMENT - THE SUPREME-COURT ONGOING STRUGGLE WITH CONSTITUTIONAL LIMITS ON PUNITIVE CIVIL SANCTIONS, Southern California law review, 70(2), 1997, pp. 517-589
Citation: Jc. Rutten, ELASTICITY IN CONSTITUTIONAL STANDARDS OF REVIEW - ADARAND-CONSTRUCTORS,-INC V PENA AND CONTINUING UNCERTAINTY IN THE SUPREME-COURT EQUAL-PROTECTION JURISPRUDENCE, Southern California law review, 70(2), 1997, pp. 591-642
Citation: Le. Blais, TAKINGS, STATUTES, AND THE COMMON-LAW - CONSIDERING INHERENT LIMITATIONS ON TITLE, Southern California law review, 70(1), 1996, pp. 1-62
Citation: Ph. Edelman et J. Chen, THE MOST DANGEROUS JUSTICE - THE SUPREME-COURT AT THE BAR OF MATHEMATICS, Southern California law review, 70(1), 1996, pp. 63-111
Citation: La. Baker, INTERDISCIPLINARY DUE DILIGENCE - THE CASE FOR COMMON-SENSE IN THE SEARCH FOR THE SWING JUSTICE, Southern California law review, 70(1), 1996, pp. 187-217
Citation: Ph. Edelman et J. Chen, DUEL DILIGENCE - 2ND-THOUGHTS ABOUT THE SUPREMES AS THE SULTANS OF SWING, Southern California law review, 70(1), 1996, pp. 219-238
Citation: A. Harrell, WHO CARES ABOUT PRIOR RESTRAINT - AN ANALYSIS OF THE FCCS ENFORCEMENTOF INDECENCY FORFEITURE ORDERS, Southern California law review, 70(1), 1996, pp. 239-279
Citation: B. Rabowsky, RECOVERY OF LOST PROFITS ON UNPATENTED PRODUCTS IN PATENT INFRINGEMENT CASES, Southern California law review, 70(1), 1996, pp. 281-336
Citation: H. Toffel, CRAZY WOMEN, UNHARMED MEN, AND EVIL CHILDREN - CONFRONTING THE MYTHS ABOUT BATTERED PEOPLE WHO KILL THEIR ABUSERS, AND THE ARGUMENT FOR EXTENDING BATTERING SYNDROME SELF-DEFENSES TO ALL VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE, Southern California law review, 70(1), 1996, pp. 337-380
Citation: Rr. Rainey et W. Rehg, THE MARKETPLACE OF IDEAS, THE PUBLIC-INTEREST, AND FEDERAL-REGULATIONOF THE ELECTRONIC MEDIA - IMPLICATIONS OF HABERMAS THEORY OF DEMOCRACY, Southern California law review, 69(6), 1996, pp. 1923-1987
Citation: Rf. Schopp, VERDICTS OF CONSCIENCE - NULLIFICATION AND NECESSITY AS JURY RESPONSES TO CRIMES OF CONSCIENCE, Southern California law review, 69(6), 1996, pp. 2039-2116
Citation: Sc. Bogle, BONNER-MALL AND SINGLE-ASSET REAL-ESTATE CASES IN CHAPTER 11 - ARE THE 1994 AMENDMENTS ENOUGH, Southern California law review, 69(6), 1996, pp. 2163-2191
Citation: Sp. Croley, VICARIOUS LIABILITY IN TORT - ON THE SOURCES AND LIMITS OF EMPLOYEE REASONABLENESS, Southern California law review, 69(5), 1996, pp. 1705-1738