Citation: To. Sargentich, THE CRITIQUE OF ACTIVE JUDICIAL-REVIEW OF ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCIES - AREEVALUATION, Administrative law review, 49(3), 1997, pp. 599-643
Citation: Sa. Shapiro, SUBSTANTIVE REFORM, JUDICIAL-REVIEW AND AGENCY RESOURCES - OSHA AS A CASE-STUDY, Administrative law review, 49(3), 1997, pp. 645-658
Citation: Sr. Hunt, DYNAMIC INTERPRETATION OR ADMINISTRATIVE REPEAL - THE SEC PROMULGATION OF RULE-58 TO DEREGULATE THE PUBLIC UTILITY HOLDING COMPANY ACT OF 1935, Administrative law review, 49(3), 1997, pp. 691-712
Citation: Pe. Bernard, EMPOWERING THE PROVIDER - A BETTER WAY TO RESOLVE MEDICARE HOSPITAL PAYMENT DISPUTES, Administrative law review, 49(2), 1997, pp. 269-344
Citation: J. Rossi, THE 1996 REVISED FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE-PROCEDURE ACT - A RULEMAKING REVOLUTION OR COUNTERREVOLUTION, Administrative law review, 49(2), 1997, pp. 345-376
Citation: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION BY THE SPECIAL COMMITTEE TO REVIEW THE GOVERNMENT IN THE SUNSHINE ACT, Administrative law review, 49(2), 1997, pp. 421-428
Citation: J. Roff, SOUTH-DAKOTA V UNITED-STATES-DEPARTMENT-OF-INTERIOR - ANOTHER BROKEN PROMISE TO THE UNITED-STATES INDIANS, Administrative law review, 49(2), 1997, pp. 453-476
Citation: By. Wen, RICE V -STATES-DEPARTMENT-OF-ALCOHOL-TOBACCO-AND-FIREARMS - CONGRESS PARALYZES SECTION 925(C) OF THE GUN-CONTROL ACT, Administrative law review, 49(2), 1997, pp. 501-518
Citation: Dj. Gifford, FEDERAL ADMINISTRATIVE-LAW JUDGES - THE RELEVANCE OF PAST CHOICES TO FUTURE-DIRECTIONS, Administrative law review, 49(1), 1997, pp. 1-60