Citation: Nm. Greenberg, Dorigen as enigma: The production of meaning and the 'Franklin's Tale' (Chaucer, 'Canterbury Tales'), CHAUCER REV, 33(4), 1999, pp. 329-349
Citation: Ws. Walker, Extant analogues of the 'Franklin's Tale' in the Turkish oral tradition (Chaucer, 'Canterbury Tales', folklore), CHAUCER REV, 33(4), 1999, pp. 432-437
Citation: V. Dimarco, 'Troilus and Criseyde' 2.884 and 933-36: Two conjectural emendations (Chaucer, text, interpretation, rhyme), CHAUCER REV, 33(3), 1999, pp. 252-263
Citation: M. Mctague, Selecting the 'best' of Chaucer for a brief survey course (English literature, education, with suggested reading list), CHAUCER REV, 33(3), 1999, pp. 316-328
Citation: C. Novelli, SIN, SIGHT, AND SANCTITY IN THE 'MILLERS TALE' - WHY CHAUCER BLACKSMITH WORKS AT NIGHT, The Chaucer review, 33(2), 1998, pp. 168-175
Citation: Rl. Kindrick, HENRYSON UTHER QUAIR AGAIN - A POSSIBLE CANDIDATE AND THE NATURE OF THE TRADITION, The Chaucer review, 33(2), 1998, pp. 190-220
Citation: Rj. Goldstein, TO-SCOTLOND-WARD-HIS-FOOMEN-FOR-TO-SEKE - CHAUCER, THE SCOTS, AND THE'MAN OF LAWS TALE', The Chaucer review, 33(1), 1998, pp. 31-42