Citation: Mk. Marler, The international criminal court: Assessing the jurisdictional loopholes in the Rome Statute, DUKE LAW J, 49(3), 1999, pp. 825-853
Citation: Kd. Jensen, The reasonable government official test: A proposal for the treatment of factual information under the federal deliberative process privilege, DUKE LAW J, 49(2), 1999, pp. 561-599
Citation: Ps. Quinn, Preserving minors' rights after Casey: The "new battlefield" of negligenceand strict liability statutes, DUKE LAW J, 49(1), 1999, pp. 297-337
Citation: Zr. Teachout, Defining and punishing abroad: Constitutional limits on the extraterritorial reach of the offenses clause, DUKE LAW J, 48(6), 1999, pp. 1305-1331
Citation: Ip. Robbins, Semiotics, analogical legal reasoning, and the cf. citation: Getting our signals uncrossed, DUKE LAW J, 48(5), 1999, pp. 1043-1080
Citation: Ap. Rose, Reproductive misconception: Why cloning is not just another assisted reproductive technology, DUKE LAW J, 48(5), 1999, pp. 1133-1156
Citation: La. Stout, Why the law hates speculators: Regulation and private ordering in the market for OTC derivatives, DUKE LAW J, 48(4), 1999, pp. 701-786
Citation: Dl. Steele, Expert testimony: Seeking an appropriate admissibility standard for behavioral science in child sexual abuse prosecutions, DUKE LAW J, 48(4), 1999, pp. 933-973