Citation: Jd. Greenberg, Is Payne defensible?: The constitutionality of admitting victim impact evidence at capital sentencing hearings, INDIANA LAW, 75(4), 2000, pp. 1349-1382
Citation: Rsa. Richman, A cause worth quitting for? The conflict between professional ethics and individual rights in discriminatory treatment of corporate counsel, INDIANA LAW, 75(3), 2000, pp. 963-1008
Citation: M. Crandley, The failure of the integrated enterprise test: Why courts meed to find newanswers to the multiple-employer puzzle in federal discrimination cases, INDIANA LAW, 75(3), 2000, pp. 1041-1071
Citation: Pk. Das, Offensive protection: The potential application of intellectual property law to scripted sports plays, INDIANA LAW, 75(3), 2000, pp. 1073-1101
Citation: Eh. Meilaender, Revisiting Indiana's rule of evidence 404(b) and the Lannan decision in light of Federal Rules of Evidence 413-415, INDIANA LAW, 75(3), 2000, pp. 1103-1124
Citation: F. Dane, Whereof one cannot speak: Legal diversity and the limits of a restatement of conflict of laws, INDIANA LAW, 75(2), 2000, pp. 511-526
Citation: Hg. Maier, The utilitarian role of a restatement of conflicts in a common law system:How much judicial deference is due to the restaters or "who are these guys, anyway?", INDIANA LAW, 75(2), 2000, pp. 541-548
Citation: B. Posnak, The Restatement (Second): Some not so fine tuning for a Restatement (Third): A very well-Curried leflar over reese with korn on the side (or is it cob?), INDIANA LAW, 75(2), 2000, pp. 561-573
Citation: Lj. Silberman et Af. Lowenfeld, A different challenge for the ALI: Herein of foreign country judgments, aninternational treaty, and an American statute, INDIANA LAW, 75(2), 2000, pp. 635-647