Citation: Km. Eide et Ta. Afarli, The syntactic disguises of the predication operator (Lexicalization, syntactic projection), STUD LING, 53(2), 1999, pp. 155-181
Citation: A. Holmberg, Remarks on Holmberg's generalization (the dependence of Scandinavian object shift on verb movement), STUD LING, 53(1), 1999, pp. 1-39
Citation: S. Iwata, Thematic parallels and non-parallels: Contributions of field-speficic properties (Temporal, Possessional, and Identificational semantic fields, Jackendoff), STUD LING, 53(1), 1999, pp. 68-101
Authors:
Neidle, C
Bahan, B
MacLaughlin, D
Lee, R
Kegl, J
Citation: C. Neidle et al., Realizations of syntactic agreement in American Sign Language: Similarities between the clause and the noun phrase, STUD LING, 52(3), 1998, pp. 191-226
Citation: Jm. Authier, On presuppositions and (non)coreference (syntax-semantics interface withinChomsky's Minimalist framework), STUD LING, 52(3), 1998, pp. 244-275
Citation: M. Klamer, KAMBERA INTRANSITIVE ARGUMENT LINKING (MORPHOSYNTAX OF AN AUSTRONESIAN LANGUAGE SPOKEN IN EASTERN INDONESIA), Studia linguistica, 52(2), 1998, pp. 77-111
Citation: V. Egerland, THE AFFECTEDNESS CONSTRAINT AND ASPP (AFFECTEDNESS CONSTRUCTION IN SWEDISH HAVE-OF-POSSESSION PLUS DP PLUS PASSIVE-PARTICIPLE), Studia linguistica, 52(1), 1998, pp. 19-47