Citation: C. Laenzlinger et U. Shlonsky, WEAK PRONOUNS AS LF CLITICS - CLUSTERING AND ADJACENCY EFFECTS IN THEPRONOMINAL SYSTEMS OF GERMAN AND HEBREW, Studia linguistica, 51(2), 1997, pp. 154-185
Citation: Ka. Jayaseelan, ANAPHORS AS PRONOUNS + CORRECTED VERSION OF THE ARTICLE ORIGINALLY PUBLISHED IN VOL 50, 1996, Studia linguistica, 51(2), 1997, pp. 186-234
Citation: J. Rooryck, ON THE INTERACTION BETWEEN RAISING AND FOCUS IN SENTENTIAL COMPLEMENTATION + LINGUISTICS, VERBAL SYNTAX, Studia linguistica, 51(1), 1997, pp. 1-49
Citation: Ka. Jayaseelan, ANAPHORS AS PRONOUNS + PRONOMINAL ELEMENTS IN MORPHOLOGICALLY COMPLEXREFLEXIVE ANAPHORS, Studia linguistica, 50(3), 1996, pp. 207-255
Citation: S. Iwata, MOTION AND EXTENT - 2 SIDES OF THE SAME COIN( THE INTERNAL STRUCTURE OF GO AND GO(EXT) BASED ON JACKENDOFF ANALYSIS ), Studia linguistica, 50(3), 1996, pp. 256-282
Citation: J. Anderson, THE REPRESENTATION OF VOWEL REDUCTION - NON-SPECIFICATION AND REDUCTION IN OLD-ENGLISH AND BULGARIAN, Studia linguistica, 50(2), 1996, pp. 91-105
Citation: L. Bauer, NO PHONETIC ICONICITY IN EVALUATIVE MORPHOLOGY + RESULTS OF TESTS ON A GENETICALLY DIVERSE GROUP OF 50 LANGUAGES, Studia linguistica, 50(2), 1996, pp. 189-206
Citation: Y. Okamura, THE GRAMMATICAL STATUS OF PURE FUTURE WILL AND THE CATEGORY OF FUTUREFORM + IN BRITISH VERSUS AMERICAN ENGLISH, Studia linguistica, 50(1), 1996, pp. 35-49
Citation: P. Branigan, VERB-2ND AND THE A-BAR SYNTAX OF SUBJECTS -2ND CLAUSE STRUCTURE( 2 COMPETING THEORIES OF VERB), Studia linguistica, 50(1), 1996, pp. 50-79
Citation: M. Menaugh, THE ENGLISH MODALS AND ESTABLISHED MODELS OF PROBABILITY AND POSSIBILITY - A SIGN-BASED ANALYSIS, Studia linguistica, 49(2), 1995, pp. 196-227