Citation: Ma. Bobinski, AUTONOMY AND PRIVACY - PROTECTING PATIENTS FROM THEIR PHYSICIANS, University of Pittsburgh law review, 55(2), 1994, pp. 291-388
Citation: Lk. Ray, DISCIPLINE THROUGH DELEGATION - SOLVING THE PROBLEM OF CONGRESSIONAL HOUSECLEANING, University of Pittsburgh law review, 55(2), 1994, pp. 389-440
Citation: N. Silber, WHY THE UCC SHOULD NOT SUBORDINATE ITSELF TO FEDERAL-AUTHORITY - IMPERFECT UNIFORMITY, IMPROPER DELEGATION AND REVISED SECTION-3-102(C), University of Pittsburgh law review, 55(2), 1994, pp. 441-500
Citation: Sb. Lichtman, THE RIGHT TO A SOAPBOX - A CRITIQUE OF SIMON-AND-SCHUSTER V MEMBERS OF THE NEW-YORK-STATE-CRIME-VICTIMS-BOARD, University of Pittsburgh law review, 55(2), 1994, pp. 501-540
Citation: Ts. Shenkin, TRADE-RELATED INVESTMENT MEASURES IN BILATERAL INVESTMENT TREATIES AND THE GATT - MOVING TOWARD A MULTILATERAL INVESTMENT TREATY, University of Pittsburgh law review, 55(2), 1994, pp. 541-597
Citation: Am. Dussias, GEOGRAPHICALLY-BASED AND MEMBERSHIP-BASED VIEWS OF INDIAN TRIBAL SOVEREIGNTY - THE SUPREME COURTS CHANGING VISION, University of Pittsburgh law review, 55(1), 1993, pp. 1-97
Citation: Mj. Mitten, TEAM PHYSICIANS AND COMPETITIVE ATHLETES - ALLOCATING LEGAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR ATHLETIC INJURIES, University of Pittsburgh law review, 55(1), 1993, pp. 129-169
Citation: Af. Skirpan, PLUS-CA-CHANGE, PLUS-CEST-LA-MEME-CHOSE - 1990 AMENDMENTS TO THE CLEAN-AIR ACT AND THEIR IMPACT ON UTILITY REGULATION, University of Pittsburgh law review, 55(1), 1993, pp. 171-206
Citation: Tm. Cunningham, EXTENDING SHAW V LINDHEIM - SUBSTANTIAL SIMILARITY AND THE IDEA-EXPRESSION DISTINCTION IN COPYRIGHT OF NONLITERARY SUBJECT-MATTER, University of Pittsburgh law review, 55(1), 1993, pp. 239-275
Citation: Ee. Bintz, FIDUCIARY RESPONSIBILITY UNDER ERISA - IS THERE EVER A FIDUCIARY DUTYTO DISCLOSE, University of Pittsburgh law review, 54(4), 1993, pp. 979-1018
Citation: Jw. Shaw, PRINCIPLED INTERPRETATIONS OF STATE CONSTITUTIONAL-LAW - WHY DONT THEPRIMACY STATES PRACTICE WHAT THEY PREACH, University of Pittsburgh law review, 54(4), 1993, pp. 1019-1050
Citation: Da. Jaffe, THE ALLOCATION OF FAULT IN AUDITOR LIABILITY LAWSUITS BROUGHT BY SOPHISTICATED 3RD-PARTY USERS OF FINANCIAL-STATEMENTS - A PLEA FOR PROPORTIONATE LIABILITY, University of Pittsburgh law review, 54(4), 1993, pp. 1051-1083
Citation: Gf. Magera, THE BANKRUPTCY CODE, MEDICARE REGULATIONS AND THE MEDICARE PROVIDER RELATIONSHIP IN BANKRUPTCY - WHEN MAY THE GOVERNMENT RECOVER MEDICARE OVERPAYMENTS FROM BANKRUPT HEALTH-CARE PROVIDERS, University of Pittsburgh law review, 54(4), 1993, pp. 1085-1126
Citation: Mj. Barry, WAYS AROUND THE WRATH - EXPLORING THE REMAINING EXCEPTIONS TO THE DOENCH, DUHME DOCTRINE AND SECTION 1823(E), University of Pittsburgh law review, 54(4), 1993, pp. 1127-1149