Authors:
Basson, R
Berman, J
Burnett, A
Derogatis, L
Ferguson, D
Fourcroy, J
Goldstein, I
Graziottin, A
Heiman, J
Laan, E
Leiblum, S
Padma-Nathan, K
Rosen, R
Segraves, K
Segraves, RT
Shabsigh, R
Sipski, M
Wagner, G
Whipple, B
Citation: R. Basson et al., Report of the international consensus development conference on female sexual dysfunction: Definitions and classifications, J SEX MAR T, 27(2), 2001, pp. 83-94
Citation: R. Basson, Are the complexities of women's sexual function reflected in the new consensus definitions of dysfunction?, J SEX MAR T, 27(2), 2001, pp. 105-112
Citation: Hm. Conaglen, Report of the International Consensus Development Conference on Female Sexual Dysfunction: A view from down under, J SEX MAR T, 27(2), 2001, pp. 127-130
Citation: Sr. Davis, An external perspective on the Report of the International Consensus Development Conference on Female Sexual Dysfunction: More work to be done, J SEX MAR T, 27(2), 2001, pp. 131-133
Citation: Go. Gabbard, Musings on the Report of the International Consensus Development Conference on Female Sexual Dysfunction: Definitions and classifications, J SEX MAR T, 27(2), 2001, pp. 145-147
Citation: M. Lachowsky, After reading the Report of the International Consensus Conference on Female Sexual Dysfunction, J SEX MAR T, 27(2), 2001, pp. 157-158
Citation: Sr. Leiblum, Critical overview of the new consensus-based definitions and classification of female sexual dysfunction, J SEX MAR T, 27(2), 2001, pp. 159-167
Citation: Mp. Mccabe, Do we need a new classification system for female sexual dysfunction? A comment on the 1999 consensus classification system, J SEX MAR T, 27(2), 2001, pp. 175-178
Citation: Cm. Meston, Receptivity and personal distress: Considerations for redefining female sexual dysfunction, J SEX MAR T, 27(2), 2001, pp. 179-182
Citation: F. Montorsi, The impact of female sexual dysfunction in the evaluation and management of the impotent patient, J SEX MAR T, 27(2), 2001, pp. 183-185