Citation: Ep. Berg et al., PORK CARCASS COMPOSITION DERIVED FROM A NEURAL-NETWORK MODEL OF ELECTROMAGNETIC SCANS, Journal of animal science, 76(1), 1998, pp. 18-22
Authors:
BERG EP
NEARY MK
FORREST JC
THOMAS DL
KAUFFMAN RG
Citation: Ep. Berg et al., EVALUATION OF ELECTRONIC TECHNOLOGY TO ASSESS LAMB CARCASS COMPOSITION, Journal of animal science, 75(9), 1997, pp. 2433-2444
Authors:
BERG EP
NEARY MK
FORREST JC
THOMAS DL
KAUFFMAN RG
Citation: Ep. Berg et al., ASSESSMENT OF LAMB CARCASS COMPOSITION FROM LIVE ANIMAL MEASUREMENT OF BIOELECTRICAL-IMPEDANCE OR ULTRASONIC TISSUE DEPTHS, Journal of animal science, 74(11), 1996, pp. 2672-2678
Authors:
BOLAND MA
FOSTER KA
SCHINCKEL AP
WAGNER J
CHEN W
BERG EP
FORREST JC
Citation: Ma. Boland et al., ALTERNATIVE PORK CARCASS EVALUATION TECHNIQUES .1. DIFFERENCES IN PREDICTIONS OF VALUE, Journal of animal science, 73(3), 1995, pp. 637-644
Authors:
BOLAND MA
FOSTER KA
SCHINCKEL AP
CHEN W
WAGNER J
BERG EP
FORREST JC
Citation: Ma. Boland et al., ALTERNATIVE PORK CARCASS EVALUATION TECHNIQUES .2. STATISTICAL-ANALYSIS OF ERROR ATTRIBUTABLE TO SEX, GENOTYPE, AND WEIGHT, Journal of animal science, 73(3), 1995, pp. 645-650
Citation: Ep. Berg et Mj. Marchello, BIOELECTRICAL-IMPEDANCE ANALYSIS FOR THE PREDICTION OF FAT-FREE MASS IN LAMBS AND LAMB CARCASSES, Journal of animal science, 72(2), 1994, pp. 322-329
Citation: Ep. Berg et al., ELECTROMAGNETIC SCANNING OF PORK CARCASSES IN AN ONLINE INDUSTRIAL CONFIGURATION, Journal of animal science, 72(10), 1994, pp. 2642-2652