Citation: Pg. Cassell, PROTECTING THE INNOCENT FROM FALSE CONFESSIONS AND LOST CONFESSIONS -AND FROM MIRANDA, Journal of criminal law & criminology, 88(2), 1998, pp. 497-556
Citation: Pg. Cassell et R. Fowles, HANDCUFFING THE COPS - A 30-YEAR PERSPECTIVE ON MIRANDAS HARMFUL EFFECTS ON LAW-ENFORCEMENT, Stanford law review, 50(4), 1998, pp. 1055-1145
Citation: Pg. Cassell et R. Fowles, FALLING CLEARANCE RATES AFTER MIRANDA - COINCIDENCE OR CONSEQUENCE, Stanford law review, 50(4), 1998, pp. 1181-1191
Citation: Pg. Cassell, BALANCED APPROACHES TO THE FALSE CONFESSION PROBLEM - A BRIEF COMMENTON OFSHE, LEO, AND ALSCHULER, Denver University law review, 74(4), 1997, pp. 1123-1133
Citation: Pg. Cassell, MIRANDAS NEGLIGIBLE EFFECT ON LAW-ENFORCEMENT - SOME SKEPTICAL OBSERVATIONS, Harvard journal of law and public policy, 20(2), 1997, pp. 327-346
Citation: Pg. Cassell et Bs. Hayman, POLICE INTERROGATION IN THE 1990S - AN EMPIRICAL-STUDY OF THE EFFECTSOF MIRANDA, UCLA law review, 43(3), 1996, pp. 839-931
Citation: Pg. Cassell, ALL BENEFITS, NO COSTS - THE GRAND ILLUSION OF MIRANDAS DEFENDERS - REPLY, Northwestern University law review, 90(3), 1996, pp. 1084-1124
Citation: Pg. Cassell, THE KING,RODNEY TRIALS AND THE DOUBLE JEOPARDY CLAUSE - SOME OBSERVATIONS ON ORIGINAL MEANING AND THE ACLUS SCHIZOPHRENIC VIEWS OF THE DUALSOVEREIGN DOCTRINE, UCLA law review, 41(3), 1994, pp. 693-720