AAAAAA
Results:
1-9
|
Results: 9
Authors:
Hutchinson, WG
Scarpa, R
Chilton, SM
McCallion, T
Citation: Wg. Hutchinson et al., Parametric and non-parametric estimates of willingness to pay for forest recreation in Northern Ireland: A discrete choice contingent valuation studywith follow-ups, J AGR ECON, 52(1), 2001, pp. 104-122
Authors:
Burton, AC
Chilton, SM
Jones, MK
Citation: Ac. Burton et al., The WTP/WTA discrepancy: A preliminary qualitative examination, ENVIR VALUE, 9(4), 2000, pp. 481-491
Authors:
Scarpa, R
Chilton, SM
Hutchinson, WG
Buongiorno, J
Citation: R. Scarpa et al., Valuing the recreational benefits from the creation of nature reserves in Irish forests, ECOL ECON, 33(2), 2000, pp. 237-250
Authors:
Chilton, SM
Hutchinson, WG
Citation: Sm. Chilton et Wg. Hutchinson, A note on the warm glow of giving and scope sensitivity in contingent valuation studies, J ECON PSYC, 21(4), 2000, pp. 343-349
Authors:
Hutchinson, WG
Chilton, SM
Citation: Wg. Hutchinson et Sm. Chilton, Combining preference ordering and contingent valuation methods to assess non market benefit of alternative afforestation projects, J RURAL ST, 15(1), 1999, pp. 103-109
Authors:
Chilton, SM
Hutchinson, WG
Citation: Sm. Chilton et Wg. Hutchinson, Do focus groups contribute anything to the contingent valuation process?, J ECON PSYC, 20(4), 1999, pp. 465-483
Authors:
Chilton, SM
Hutchinson, WG
Citation: Sm. Chilton et Wg. Hutchinson, Focus groups and the contingent valuation process: A reply, J ECON PSYC, 20(4), 1999, pp. 495-498
Authors:
Chilton, SM
Hutchinson, WG
Citation: Sm. Chilton et Wg. Hutchinson, Some further implications of incorporating the warm glow of giving into welfare measures: A comment on the use of donation mechanisms by Champ et al, J ENVIR EC, 37(2), 1999, pp. 202-209
Authors:
Chilton, SM
Hutchinson, MG
Citation: Sm. Chilton et Mg. Hutchinson, Exploring divergence between respondent and researcher definitions of the good in contingent valuation studies, J AGR ECON, 50(1), 1999, pp. 1-16
Risultati:
1-9
|