Citation: Dm. Ennis, THE BETA-BINOMIAL MODEL - ACCOUNTING FOR INTER-TRIAL VARIATION IN REPLICATED DIFFERENCE AND PREFERENCE TESTS, Journal of sensory studies, 13(4), 1998, pp. 389-412
Citation: J. Bi et Dm. Ennis, A THURSTONIAN VARIANT OF THE BETA-BINOMIAL MODEL FOR REPLICATED DIFFERENCE TESTS, Journal of sensory studies, 13(4), 1998, pp. 461-466
Citation: Dm. Ennis, FOUNDATIONS OF SENSORY SCIENCE AND A VISION FOR THE FUTURE (VOL 52, PG 78, 1998), Food technology (Chicago), 52(9), 1998, pp. 147-147
Citation: Jm. Ennis et al., THURSTONIAN MODELS FOR VARIANTS OF THE METHOD OF TETRADS, British journal of mathematical & statistical psychology, 51, 1998, pp. 205-215
Citation: Tr. Rosett et al., SEPARATING SENSORY AND COGNITIVE COMPONENTS OF DECISION-MAKING IN A STUDY OF SALT TASTE, Food quality and preference, 8(1), 1997, pp. 9-18
Authors:
CRAIG CB
DARNELL BE
WEINSIER RL
SAAG MS
EPPS L
MULLINS L
LAPIDUS WI
ENNIS DM
AKRABAWI SS
CORNWELL PE
SAUBERLICH HE
Citation: Cb. Craig et al., DECREASED FAT AND NITROGEN LOSSES IN PATIENTS WITH AIDS RECEIVING MEDIUM-CHAIN-TRIGLYCERIDE-ENRICHED FORMULA VS THOSE RECEIVING LONG-CHAIN-TRIGLYCERIDE-CONTAINING FORMULA, Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 97(6), 1997, pp. 605-611
Citation: Dm. Ennis et al., A RANDOMIZED COMPARATIVE TRIAL OF AZITHROMYCIN AND BENZATHINE PENICILLIN-G FOR PREVENTION OF SYPHILIS IN EXPOSED PATIENTS, Clinical infectious diseases, 23(4), 1996, pp. 307-307
Authors:
ENNIS DM
LACKEY PC
GOOD JK
JERNIGAN DB
LAKEMAN F
WHITLEY RJ
RICHEY CM
HOOK EW
Citation: Dm. Ennis et al., THE ETIOLOGY OF CONCOMITANT URETHRITIS IN MEN WITH GENITAL ULCER DISEASE (GUD), Clinical infectious diseases, 23(4), 1996, pp. 313-313
Citation: Dm. Ennis, A GENERAL MOLECULAR-MODEL FOR THE EFFECT OF MULTICOMPONENT MIXTURES ON BIOLOGICAL-SYSTEMS, Food chemistry, 56(3), 1996, pp. 329-335
Citation: Dm. Ennis et M. Omahony, PROBABILISTIC MODELS FOR SEQUENTIAL TASTE EFFECTS IN TRIADIC CHOICE, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 21(5), 1995, pp. 1088-1097
Citation: S. Tedja et al., TRIADIC DISCRIMINATION TESTING - REFINEMENT OF THURSTONIAN AND SEQUENTIAL SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS APPROACHES, Chemical senses, 19(4), 1994, pp. 279-301
Citation: Dm. Ennis et Nl. Johnson, A GENERAL-MODEL FOR PREFERENTIAL AND TRIADIC CHOICE IN TERMS OF CENTRAL F DISTRIBUTION-FUNCTIONS, Psychometrika, 59(1), 1994, pp. 91-96
Citation: En. Geelhoed et al., PREFERENCE GIVES MORE CONSISTENT JUDGMENTS THAN ODDITY ONLY IF THE TASK CAN BE MODELED AS FORCED-CHOICE, Perception & psychophysics, 55(4), 1994, pp. 473-477
Citation: Dm. Ennis et Fg. Ashby, THE RELATIVE SENSITIVITIES OF SAME-DIFFERENT AND IDENTIFICATION JUDGMENT MODELS TO PERCEPTUAL DEPENDENCE, Psychometrika, 58(2), 1993, pp. 257-279
Citation: Dm. Ennis, A SINGLE MULTIDIMENSIONAL MODEL FOR DISCRIMINATION, IDENTIFICATION AND PREFERENTIAL CHOICE, Acta psychologica, 84(1), 1993, pp. 17-27