Authors: MESECK NL GWARTNEY BL CALKINS CR MILLER PS

Citation: Nl. Meseck et al., INFLUENCE OF SAMPLE ORIENTATION ON PREDICTION OF FRESH HAM LEAN CONTENT BY ELECTROMAGNETIC SCANNING, Journal of animal science, 75(12), 1997, pp. 3169-3173

Authors: VIESELMEYER BA RASBY RJ GWARTNEY BL CALKINS CR STOCK RA GOSEY JA

Citation: Ba. Vieselmeyer et al., USE OF EXPECTED PROGENY DIFFERENCES FOR MARBLING IN BEEF .1. PRODUCTION TRAITS, Journal of animal science, 74(5), 1996, pp. 1009-1013

Authors: GWARTNEY BL CALKINS CR RASBY RJ STOCK RA VIESELMEYER BA GOSEY JA

Citation: Bl. Gwartney et al., USE OF EXPECTED PROGENY DIFFERENCES FOR MARBLING IN BEEF .2. CARCASS AND PALATABILITY TRAITS, Journal of animal science, 74(5), 1996, pp. 1014-1022

Authors: GWARTNEY BL MESECK NL CALKINS CR

Citation: Bl. Gwartney et al., THE EFFECTS OF ORIENTATION AND STORAGE TIME ON THE PREDICTION OF BEEFRIB COMPOSITION USING ELECTROMAGNETIC SCANNING, Journal of animal science, 73(2), 1995, pp. 387-392

Authors: GWARTNEY BL CALKINS CR LIN RS FORREST JC PARKHURST AM LEMENAGER RP

Citation: Bl. Gwartney et al., ELECTROMAGNETIC SCANNING OF BEEF QUARTERS TO PREDICT CARCASS AND PRIMAL LEAN CONTENT, Journal of animal science, 72(11), 1994, pp. 2836-2842

Authors: NEEL SW WILLIAMS SE JOHNSON LP GWARTNEY BL REAGAN JO

Citation: Sw. Neel et al., FOODSERVICE INDUSTRY MARKET PROFILE STUDY - IN-PLANT BEEF FAT TRIM LEVEL SURVEY AND CUTTING YIELDS, Journal of animal science, 71(7), 1993, pp. 1805-1811