Authors:
JOHNSTON RJ
STAMM ER
LEWIN JM
HENDRICK RE
ARCHER PG
Citation: Rj. Johnston et al., DIAGNOSIS OF FATTY INFILTRATION OF THE LIVER ON CONTRAST-ENHANCED CT - LIMITATIONS OF LIVER-MINUS-SPLEEN ATTENUATION DIFFERENCE MEASUREMENTS, Abdominal imaging, 23(4), 1998, pp. 409-415
Authors:
FEIG SA
DORSI CJ
HENDRICK RE
JACKSON VP
KOPANS DB
MONSEES B
SICKLES EA
STELLING CB
ZINNINGER M
WILCOXBUCHALLA P
Citation: Sa. Feig et al., AMERICAN-COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY GUIDELINES FOR BREAST-CANCER SCREENING, American journal of roentgenology, 171(1), 1998, pp. 29-33
Authors:
LEWIN JM
HENDRICK RE
DORSI CJ
MOSS LJ
SISNEY GA
KARELLAS A
Citation: Jm. Lewin et al., CLINICAL-EVALUATION OF A FULL-FIELD DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY PROTOTYPE FORCANCER-DETECTION IN A SCREENING SETTING - WORK-IN-PROGRESS, Radiology, 209P, 1998, pp. 418-418
Citation: Sa. Feig et Re. Hendrick, BENEFIT RISK OF ANNUAL VERSUS BIENNIAL MAMMOGRAPHIC SCREENING OF WOMEN AGED 40-49 YEARS/, Radiology, 205, 1997, pp. 6-6
Authors:
HENDRICK RE
BERNS E
CHORBAJIAN B
CHOI K
LEWIN JM
SISNEY GA
Citation: Re. Hendrick et al., LOW-CONTRAST LESION DETECTION - COMPARISON OF SCREEN-FILM AND FULL-FIELD DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY, Radiology, 205, 1997, pp. 569-569
Citation: Ra. Smith et al., BENEFIT OF MAMMOGRAPHY SCREENING IN WOMEN AGES 40-49 YEARS - CURRENT EVIDENCE FROM RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS - REPLY (VOL 78, PG 573, 1996), Cancer, 78(7), 1996, pp. 1524-1524
Citation: Ra. Smart et al., BENEFIT OF MAMMOGRAPHY SCREENING IN WOMEN AGES 40-49 YEARS - CURRENT EVIDENCE FROM RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS - REPLY, Cancer, 78(3), 1996, pp. 573-574
Authors:
OSUCH JR
ANTHONY M
BASSETT LW
DEBOR M
DORSI C
HENDRICK RE
LINVER M
SMITH R
Citation: Jr. Osuch et al., A PROPOSAL FOR A NATIONAL MAMMOGRAPHY DATABASE - CONTENT, PURPOSE, AND VALUE, American journal of roentgenology, 164(6), 1995, pp. 1329-1334
Authors:
FEIG SA
BASSETT LW
VYBORNY CJ
YAFFE MJ
HENDRICK RE
EHRLICH SM
Citation: Sa. Feig et al., INTERRATER AGREEMENT AND INTRARATER RELIABILITY IN THE RADIOLOGIC ASSESSMENT OF EXPOSURE, CONTRAST, RESOLUTION, NOISE, ARTIFACTS, AND QUALITY OF MAMMOGRAPHIC IMAGES, Radiology, 197, 1995, pp. 242-242
Authors:
HENDRICK RE
HOLLAND A
RUSS PD
JIN H
SISNEY GA
Citation: Re. Hendrick et al., HIGH-RESOLUTION BREAST MR-IMAGING - CORRELATION WITH BREAST HISTOLOGIC CHARACTERISTICS, Radiology, 197, 1995, pp. 288-288
Authors:
YAFFE MJ
HENDRICK RE
FEIG SA
ROTHENBERG LN
OCH J
GAGNE R
Citation: Mj. Yaffe et al., RECOMMENDED SPECIFICATIONS FOR NEW MAMMOGRAPHY EQUIPMENT - REPORT OF THE ACR-CDC FOCUS GROUP ON MAMMOGRAPHY EQUIPMENT, Radiology, 197(1), 1995, pp. 19-26
Citation: Cr. Smart et al., BENEFIT OF MAMMOGRAPHY SCREENING IN WOMEN AGES 40-49 YEARS - CURRENT EVIDENCE FROM RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS - REPLY, Cancer, 76(9), 1995, pp. 1680-1681
Authors:
SMART CR
HENDRICK RE
RUTLEDGE JH
SMITH RA
Citation: Cr. Smart et al., BENEFIT OF MAMMOGRAPHY SCREENING IN WOMEN AGES 40 TO 49 YEARS - CURRENT EVIDENCE FROM RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS, Cancer, 75(7), 1995, pp. 1619-1626
Citation: Re. Hendrick, THE AAPM RSNA PHYSICS TUTORIAL FOR RESIDENTS - BASIC PHYSICS OF MR-IMAGING - AN INTRODUCTION, Radiographics, 14(4), 1994, pp. 829-846