AAAAAA

   
Results: 1-24 |
Results: 24

Authors: JOHNSTON RJ STAMM ER LEWIN JM HENDRICK RE ARCHER PG
Citation: Rj. Johnston et al., DIAGNOSIS OF FATTY INFILTRATION OF THE LIVER ON CONTRAST-ENHANCED CT - LIMITATIONS OF LIVER-MINUS-SPLEEN ATTENUATION DIFFERENCE MEASUREMENTS, Abdominal imaging, 23(4), 1998, pp. 409-415

Authors: FEIG SA DORSI CJ HENDRICK RE JACKSON VP KOPANS DB MONSEES B SICKLES EA STELLING CB ZINNINGER M WILCOXBUCHALLA P
Citation: Sa. Feig et al., AMERICAN-COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY GUIDELINES FOR BREAST-CANCER SCREENING, American journal of roentgenology, 171(1), 1998, pp. 29-33

Authors: LEWIN JM HENDRICK RE DORSI CJ MOSS LJ SISNEY GA KARELLAS A
Citation: Jm. Lewin et al., CLINICAL-EVALUATION OF A FULL-FIELD DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY PROTOTYPE FORCANCER-DETECTION IN A SCREENING SETTING - WORK-IN-PROGRESS, Radiology, 209P, 1998, pp. 418-418

Authors: HENDRICK RE CHRVALA CA PLOTT CM CUTTER GR JESSOP NW WILCOXBUCHALLA P
Citation: Re. Hendrick et al., IMPROVEMENT IN MAMMOGRAPHY QUALITY-CONTROL - 1987-1995, Radiology, 207(3), 1998, pp. 663-668

Authors: FEIG SA HENDRICK RE
Citation: Sa. Feig et Re. Hendrick, BENEFIT RISK OF ANNUAL VERSUS BIENNIAL MAMMOGRAPHIC SCREENING OF WOMEN AGED 40-49 YEARS/, Radiology, 205, 1997, pp. 6-6

Authors: HENDRICK RE BERNS E CHORBAJIAN B CHOI K LEWIN JM SISNEY GA
Citation: Re. Hendrick et al., LOW-CONTRAST LESION DETECTION - COMPARISON OF SCREEN-FILM AND FULL-FIELD DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY, Radiology, 205, 1997, pp. 569-569

Authors: HENDRICK RE PAQUELET JR
Citation: Re. Hendrick et Jr. Paquelet, IS THE MAMMOGRAPHY QUALITY STANDARDS ACT WORTH THE COST - RESPONSE, Radiology, 199(1), 1996, pp. 286-288

Authors: SMITH RA HENDRICK RE SMART CR
Citation: Ra. Smith et al., BENEFIT OF MAMMOGRAPHY SCREENING IN WOMEN AGES 40-49 YEARS - CURRENT EVIDENCE FROM RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS - REPLY (VOL 78, PG 573, 1996), Cancer, 78(7), 1996, pp. 1524-1524

Authors: SMART RA SMART CR HENDRICK RE
Citation: Ra. Smart et al., BENEFIT OF MAMMOGRAPHY SCREENING IN WOMEN AGES 40-49 YEARS - CURRENT EVIDENCE FROM RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS - REPLY, Cancer, 78(3), 1996, pp. 573-574

Authors: OSUCH JR ANTHONY M BASSETT LW DEBOR M DORSI C HENDRICK RE LINVER M SMITH R
Citation: Jr. Osuch et al., A PROPOSAL FOR A NATIONAL MAMMOGRAPHY DATABASE - CONTENT, PURPOSE, AND VALUE, American journal of roentgenology, 164(6), 1995, pp. 1329-1334

Authors: PLOTT CM HENDRICK RE CHRVALA CA
Citation: Cm. Plott et al., VARIATIONS IN MAMMOGRAPHY EQUIPMENT USE AND PERFORMANCE, Radiology, 197, 1995, pp. 220-220

Authors: YAFFE MJ DEWERD LA JENNINGS RJ BARNES GT HENDRICK RE FEIG SA
Citation: Mj. Yaffe et al., PROTOTYPE EVALUATION PHANTOM FOR MAMMOGRAPHY, Radiology, 197, 1995, pp. 220-220

Authors: FEIG SA BASSETT LW VYBORNY CJ YAFFE MJ HENDRICK RE EHRLICH SM
Citation: Sa. Feig et al., INTERRATER AGREEMENT AND INTRARATER RELIABILITY IN THE RADIOLOGIC ASSESSMENT OF EXPOSURE, CONTRAST, RESOLUTION, NOISE, ARTIFACTS, AND QUALITY OF MAMMOGRAPHIC IMAGES, Radiology, 197, 1995, pp. 242-242

Authors: HENDRICK RE HOLLAND A RUSS PD JIN H SISNEY GA
Citation: Re. Hendrick et al., HIGH-RESOLUTION BREAST MR-IMAGING - CORRELATION WITH BREAST HISTOLOGIC CHARACTERISTICS, Radiology, 197, 1995, pp. 288-288

Authors: YAFFE MJ HENDRICK RE FEIG SA ROTHENBERG LN OCH J GAGNE R
Citation: Mj. Yaffe et al., RECOMMENDED SPECIFICATIONS FOR NEW MAMMOGRAPHY EQUIPMENT - REPORT OF THE ACR-CDC FOCUS GROUP ON MAMMOGRAPHY EQUIPMENT, Radiology, 197(1), 1995, pp. 19-26

Authors: HENDRICK RE PAQUELET JR
Citation: Re. Hendrick et Jr. Paquelet, IS THE MAMMOGRAPHY QUALITY STANDARDS ACT WORTH THE COST, Radiology, 197(1), 1995, pp. 53-57

Authors: HENDRICK RE HENDEE WR
Citation: Re. Hendrick et Wr. Hendee, ROSSI,RAYMOND,P., MS 1945-1994, Radiology, 196(1), 1995, pp. 288-288

Authors: HENDRICK RE BOTSCO M PLOTT CM
Citation: Re. Hendrick et al., QUALITY-CONTROL IN MAMMOGRAPHY, The Radiologic clinics of North America, 33(6), 1995, pp. 1041

Authors: SMART CR HENDRICK RE SMITH RA
Citation: Cr. Smart et al., BENEFIT OF MAMMOGRAPHY SCREENING IN WOMEN AGES 40-49 YEARS - CURRENT EVIDENCE FROM RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS - REPLY, Cancer, 76(9), 1995, pp. 1680-1681

Authors: SMART CR HENDRICK RE RUTLEDGE JH SMITH RA
Citation: Cr. Smart et al., BENEFIT OF MAMMOGRAPHY SCREENING IN WOMEN AGES 40 TO 49 YEARS - CURRENT EVIDENCE FROM RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS, Cancer, 75(7), 1995, pp. 1619-1626

Authors: HENDRICK RE
Citation: Re. Hendrick, THE AAPM RSNA PHYSICS TUTORIAL FOR RESIDENTS - BASIC PHYSICS OF MR-IMAGING - AN INTRODUCTION, Radiographics, 14(4), 1994, pp. 829-846

Authors: BARNES GT HENDRICK RE
Citation: Gt. Barnes et Re. Hendrick, MAMMOGRAPHY ACCREDITATION AND EQUIPMENT PERFORMANCE, Radiographics, 14(1), 1994, pp. 129-138

Authors: JACKSON VP HENDRICK RE FEIG SA KOPANS DB
Citation: Vp. Jackson et al., IMAGING OF THE RADIOGRAPHICALLY DENSE BREAST, Radiology, 188(2), 1993, pp. 297-301

Authors: HENDRICK RE
Citation: Re. Hendrick, MAMMOGRAPHY QUALITY ASSURANCE - CURRENT ISSUES, Cancer, 72(4), 1993, pp. 1466-1474
Risultati: 1-24 |