Citation: Em. Scalzetti et al., HOW DO TECHNIQUE FACTORS AND DOSES VARY WITH PATIENT SIZE FOR CHEST CT EXAMINATIONS, Radiology, 209P, 1998, pp. 453-453
Citation: Na. Gkanatsios et al., HOW DOES MAGNIFICATION AFFECT PATIENT DOSE AND IMAGE QUALITY IN NEURORADIOLOGIC DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY, Radiology, 209P, 1998, pp. 602-602
Citation: W. Huda et al., COMPARISON OF A PHOTOSTIMULABLE PHOSPHOR SYSTEM WITH FILM FOR DENTAL RADIOLOGY, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology and endodontics, 83(6), 1997, pp. 725-731
Citation: W. Huda et al., SUPPORT LINE AND TUBE VISIBILITY IN CHEST EXAMINATIONS USING COMPUTEDRADIOGRAPHY, Journal of digital imaging, 10(3), 1997, pp. 126-131
Citation: W. Huda et al., RELATIVE SPEEDS OF KODAK COMPUTED RADIOGRAPHY PHOSPHORS AND SCREEN-FILM SYSTEMS, Medical physics, 24(10), 1997, pp. 1621-1628
Authors:
HUDA W
HONEYMAN JC
PALMER CK
FROST MM
STAAB EV
Citation: W. Huda et al., COMPUTED RADIOGRAPHY AND FILM DIGITIZER INPUTS TO AN INTENSIVE-CARE UNIT TELERADIOLOGY SYSTEM - AN IMAGE QUALITY COMPARISON, Academic radiology, 3(2), 1996, pp. 110-114
Citation: Gy. Qu et al., COMPARISON OF TRAINED AND UNTRAINED OBSERVERS USING SUBJECTIVE AND OBJECTIVE MEASURES OF IMAGING PERFORMANCE, Academic radiology, 3(1), 1996, pp. 31-35
Authors:
HONEYMAN JC
HUDA W
FROST MM
PALMER CK
STAAB EV
Citation: Jc. Honeyman et al., PICTURE ARCHIVING AND COMMUNICATION-SYSTEM BANDWIDTH AND STORAGE REQUIREMENTS, Journal of digital imaging, 9(2), 1996, pp. 60-66
Citation: W. Huda et al., A COST-ANALYSIS OF COMPUTED RADIOGRAPHY AND PICTURE ARCHIVING AND COMMUNICATION-SYSTEMS IN PORTABLE RADIOGRAPHY, Journal of digital imaging, 9(1), 1996, pp. 39-44
Authors:
GRAVENSTEIN D
LAMPOTANG S
HUDA W
SULTAN A
Citation: D. Gravenstein et al., BASIC PRINCIPLES OF OPTICAL RADIATION AND SOME COMMON APPLICATIONS INANESTHESIA, Journal of clinical monitoring, 12(6), 1996, pp. 445-454