Authors: CAUL WF BARRETT RJ HUFFMAN EM STADLER JR

Citation: Wf. Caul et al., REBOUND RESPONDING FOLLOWING A SINGLE-DOSE OF DRUG USING AN AMPHETAMINE-VEHICLE-HALOPERIDOL DRUG DISCRIMINATION, Psychopharmacology, 128(3), 1996, pp. 274-279

Authors: MCALLISTER MM HUFFMAN EM HIETALA SK CONRAD PA ANDERSON ML SALMAN MD

Citation: Mm. Mcallister et al., EVIDENCE SUGGESTING A POINT-SOURCE EXPOSURE IN AN OUTBREAK OF BOVINE ABORTION DUE TO NEOSPOROSIS, Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation, 8(3), 1996, pp. 355-357

Authors: HUFFMAN EM CAUL WF STRAND EJ JONES JR BARRETT RJ

Citation: Em. Huffman et al., D-2-SPECIFIC DISCRIMINATIVE STIMULI - PARAMETERS, BLOCKING, AND REBOUND, Pharmacology, biochemistry and behavior, 51(1), 1995, pp. 77-82

Authors: BARRETT RJ CAUL WF HUFFMAN EM SMITH RL

Citation: Rj. Barrett et al., DRUG DISCRIMINATION IS A CONTINUOUS RATHER THAN A QUANTAL PROCESS FOLLOWING TRAINING ON A VI-TO SCHEDULE OF REINFORCEMENT, Psychopharmacology, 113(3-4), 1994, pp. 289-296

Authors: BARRETT RJ CAUL WF HUFFMAN EM SMITH RL

Citation: Rj. Barrett et al., CONTINUOUS OR QUANTAL DATA IN DRUG DISCRIMINATION EXPERIMENTS IS A MEASUREMENT ISSUE NOT A REINFORCEMENT ISSUE - DISADVANTAGES OF QUANTAL DRUG DISCRIMINATION PROCEDURES - DRUG DISCRIMINATION IS A CONTINUOUS RATHER THAN A QUANTAL PROCESS FOLLOWING TRAINING ON A VI-TO SCHEDULE OF REINFORCEMENT - REPLY, Psychopharmacology, 113(3-4), 1994, pp. 302-303