Citation: Dt. Kenrick et A. Barr, TESTOSTERONES ROLE IN DOMINANCE, SEX, AND AGGRESSION - WHY SO CONTROVERSIAL, Behavioral and brain sciences, 21(3), 1998, pp. 379
Citation: Sl. Brown et Dt. Kenrick, PARADOXICAL SELF-DECEPTION - MAYBE NOT SO PARADOXICAL AFTER ALL, Behavioral and brain sciences, 20(1), 1997, pp. 109
Citation: Dt. Kenrick et Rc. Keefe, AGE PREFERENCES IN MATES - AN EVEN CLOSER LOOK, WITHOUT THE DISTORTING LENSES - AUTHORS RESPONSE, Behavioral and brain sciences, 20(1), 1997, pp. 140
Citation: Ca. Kallgren et Dt. Kenrick, ETHICAL JUDGMENTS OF ANIMAL RESEARCH - THE ROLES OF SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS, COSTS AND BENEFITS, International journal of psychology, 31(3-4), 1996, pp. 1526-1526
Authors:
KENRICK DT
GABRIELIDIS C
KEEFE RC
CORNELIUS JS
Citation: Dt. Kenrick et al., ADOLESCENTS AGE PREFERENCES FOR DATING PARTNERS - SUPPORT FOR AN EVOLUTIONARY MODEL OF LIFE-HISTORY STRATEGIES, Child development, 67(4), 1996, pp. 1499-1511
Authors:
KENRICK DT
BRYAN A
BARR A
BROWN S
KEEFE RC
Citation: Dt. Kenrick et al., AGE PREFERENCES AND MATE CHOICE AMONG HOMOSEXUALS AND HETEROSEXUALS -A CASE FOR MODULAR PSYCHOLOGICAL MECHANISMS, Journal of personality and social psychology, 69(6), 1995, pp. 1166-1172
Citation: Bl. Green et Dt. Kenrick, THE ATTRACTIVENESS OF GENDER-TYPED TRAITS AT DIFFERENT RELATIONSHIP LEVELS - ANDROGYNOUS CHARACTERISTICS MAY BE DESIRABLE AFTER ALL, Personality & social psychology bulletin, 20(3), 1994, pp. 244-253
Citation: Dt. Kenrick et al., EVOLUTION AND SOCIAL COGNITION - CONTRAST EFFECTS AS A FUNCTION OF SEX, DOMINANCE, AND PHYSICAL ATTRACTIVENESS, Personality & social psychology bulletin, 20(2), 1994, pp. 210-217
Citation: Dt. Kenrick et Rc. Keefe, GENDER AND SEXUAL ORIENTATION - WHY THE DIFFERENT AGE PREFERENCES - AUTHORS RESPONSE, Behavioral and brain sciences, 17(3), 1994, pp. 582-584
Citation: Dt. Kenrick et al., INTEGRATING EVOLUTIONARY AND SOCIAL-EXCHANGE PERSPECTIVES ON RELATIONSHIPS - EFFECTS OF GENDER, SELF-APPRAISAL, AND INVOLVEMENT LEVEL ON MATE SELECTION CRITERIA, Journal of personality and social psychology, 64(6), 1993, pp. 951-969