Authors:
VICHINSKY EP
HABERKERN CH
NEUMAYR L
EARLES AN
BLACK D
KOSHY M
PEGELOW C
ABBOUD M
OHENEFREMPONG K
IYER RV
NAGEL R
JOHNSON R
SEARS D
WONG M
PARKE J
BRAY G
HURST D
KOBLENZ L
VICHINSKY E
DEALARCON P
GROSSI M
WALDRON P
WALTERS M
RUSSO C
MURPHY S
SMITH H
WOODS G
GUARINI L
HURLET A
PIOMELLI S
KINNEY T
PHILLIPS G
DAESCHNER C
HOLBROOK T
BUCHANAN I
ECKMAN J
CLASTER S
HUME H
OLIVERI N
BELLEVUE R
MANKAD V
WANG W
MILNER P
JACKSON S
BENJAMIN L
BESTAK M
RADEL E
BARUCHEL S
ESSENTINE D
BLEI F
EMBURY S
MENTZER W
GILLETTE P
MILLER S
RAO S
GROVER R
RAMIREZ G
WETHERS D
GLADER B
JENNINGS W
RUCKNAGEL D
KALINYAK K
LANE P
TALISCHY N
IYER R
STEINBERG M
COOPER H
ORRINGER E
MANKAD V
YANG Y
JOHNSON C
POWARS D
Citation: Ep. Vichinsky et al., A COMPARISON OF CONSERVATIVE AND AGGRESSIVE TRANSFUSION REGIMENS IN THE PERIOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT OF SICKLE-CELL DISEASE, The New England journal of medicine, 333(4), 1995, pp. 206-213