Citation: K. Knutsson et al., DENTISTS JUDGMENT OF PROPHYLACTIC REMOVAL - A COMPARISON OVER 10 YEARS, Journal of dental research, 77, 1998, pp. 164-164
Citation: M. Rohlin et al., JUDGMENT STRATEGIES OF THE PROPHYLACTIC REMOVAL OF MANDIBULAR 3RD MOLARS, Journal of dental research, 76(5), 1997, pp. 1129-1129
Citation: K. Knutsson et al., MANDIBULAR 3RD MOLARS AS MEDIATED BY 3 CUES - DENTISTS TREATMENT DECISIONS ON ASYMPTOMATIC MOLARS COMPARED WITH MOLARS ASSOCIATED WITH PATHOLOGICAL CONDITIONS, Acta Odontologica Scandinavica, 55(6), 1997, pp. 372-377
Citation: K. Knutsson et al., PATHOSES ASSOCIATED WITH MANDIBULAR 3RD MOLARS SUBJECTED TO REMOVAL, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology and endodontics, 82(1), 1996, pp. 10-17
Citation: K. Knutsson et al., JUDGMENT ON REMOVAL OF ASYMPTOMATIC MANDIBULAR 3RD MOLARS - INFLUENCEOF POSITION, DEGREE OF IMPACTION, AND PATIENTS AGE, Acta Odontologica Scandinavica, 54(6), 1996, pp. 348-354
Citation: L. Lysell et al., RATING THE PREVENTIVE INDICATION FOR MANDIBULAR 3RD-MOLAR SURGERY - THE APPROPRIATENESS OF THE VISUAL ANALOG SCALE, Acta Odontologica Scandinavica, 53(1), 1995, pp. 60-64
Citation: L. Lysell et al., JUDGMENT ON REMOVAL OF ASYMPTOMATIC MANDIBULAR 3RD MOLARS - INFLUENCEOF THE PERCEIVED LIKELIHOOD OF PATHOLOGY, Dento-maxillo-facial radiology, 22(4), 1993, pp. 173-177
Citation: K. Knutsson et al., ASYMPTOMATIC MANDIBULAR 3RD MOLARS - ORAL SURGEONS JUDGMENT OF THE NEED FOR EXTRACTION, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 50(4), 1992, pp. 329-333