Authors: CURPEN BN SICKLES EA SOLLITTO RA OMINSKY SH GALVIN HB FRANKEL SD

Citation: Bn. Curpen et al., THE COMPARATIVE VALUE OF MAMMOGRAPHIC SCREENING FOR WOMEN 40-49 YEARSOLD VERSUS WOMEN 50-64 YEARS OLD, American journal of roentgenology, 164(5), 1995, pp. 1099-1103

Authors: FRANKEL SD SICKLES EA CURPEN BN SOLLITTO RA OMINSKY SH GALVIN HB

Citation: Sd. Frankel et al., INITIAL VERSUS SUBSEQUENT SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHY - COMPARISON OF FINDINGS AND THEIR PROGNOSTIC-SIGNIFICANCE, American journal of roentgenology, 164(5), 1995, pp. 1107-1109

Authors: FAULK RM SICKLES EA SOLLITTO RA OMINSKY SH GALVIN HB FRANKEL SD

Citation: Rm. Faulk et al., CLINICAL EFFICACY OF MAMMOGRAPHIC SCREENING IN THE ELDERLY, Radiology, 194(1), 1995, pp. 193-197

Authors: GRONNER AT OMINSKY SH

Citation: At. Gronner et Sh. Ominsky, PLAIN FILM RADIOGRAPHY OF THE CHEST - FINDINGS THAT SIMULATE PULMONARY-DISEASE, American journal of roentgenology, 163(6), 1994, pp. 1343-1348

Authors: OMINSKY SH

Citation: Sh. Ominsky, NODULOCYSTIC ACNE AS THE CAUSE OF RING LESIONS ON MAMMOGRAMS, American journal of roentgenology, 163(1), 1994, pp. 221-221