Citation: Ct. Kello et Dc. Plaut, Strategic control in word reading: Evidence from speeded responding in thetempo-naming task, J EXP PSY L, 26(3), 2000, pp. 719-750
Citation: Dc. Plaut et Lm. Gonnerman, Are non-semantic morphological effects incompatible with a distributed connectionist approach to lexical processing?, LANG COGN P, 15(4-5), 2000, pp. 445-485
Citation: Ct. Kello et al., The task dependence of staged versus cascaded processing: An empirical andcomputational study of stroop interference in speech production, J EXP PSY G, 129(3), 2000, pp. 340-360
Citation: Dc. Plaut et Jr. Booth, Individual and developmental differences in semantic priming: Empirical and computational support for a single-mechanism account of lexical processing, PSYCHOL REV, 107(4), 2000, pp. 786-823
Citation: P. Mcleod et al., Attractor dynamics in word recognition: converging evidence from errors bynormal subjects, dyslexic patients and a connectionist model, COGNITION, 74(1), 2000, pp. 91-113
Citation: Jl. Mcclelland et Dc. Plaut, Does generalization in infant learning implicate abstract algebra-like rules?, TRENDS C SC, 3(5), 1999, pp. 166-168
Citation: Dc. Plaut, A connectionist approach to word reading and acquired dyslexia: Extension to sequential processing, COGN SCI, 23(4), 1999, pp. 543-568
Citation: Dlt. Rohde et Dc. Plaut, Simple recurrent networks can distinguish nonoccurring from ungrammatical sentences given appropriate task structure: reply to Marcus, COGNITION, 73(3), 1999, pp. 297-300
Citation: Dlt. Rohde et Dc. Plaut, Language acquisition in the absence of explicit negative evidence: how important is starting small?, COGNITION, 72(1), 1999, pp. 67-109
Citation: Ms. Seidenberg et Dc. Plaut, Evaluating word-reading models at the item level: Matching the grain of theory and data, PSYCHOL SCI, 9(3), 1998, pp. 234-237