Citation: Cl. Barry et L. Schamber, USERS CRITERIA FOR RELEVANCE EVALUATION - A CROSS-SITUATIONAL COMPARISON, Information processing & management, 34(2-3), 1998, pp. 219-236
Citation: A. Spink et al., USE OF SCHOLARLY BOOK REVIEWS - IMPLICATIONS FOR ELECTRONIC PUBLISHING AND SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATION, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(4), 1998, pp. 364-374
Citation: L. Schamber, INFORMATION-SEEKING IN ELECTRONIC ENVIRONMENTS - MARCHIONINI,G, Journal of education for library and information science, 37(1), 1996, pp. 81-83
Citation: L. Schamber et J. Bateman, USER CRITERIA IN RELEVANCE EVALUATION - TOWARD DEVELOPMENT OF A MEASUREMENT SCALE, Proceedings of the ASIS annual meeting, 33, 1996, pp. 218-225
Citation: L. Schamber, SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATION-RESEARCH - PERSPECTIVES OF INFORMATION-SCIENCE AND RELATED FIELDS, Proceedings of the ASIS annual meeting, 33, 1996, pp. 284-284
Citation: L. Schamber, WHAT IS A DOCUMENT - RETHINKING THE CONCEPT IN UNEASY TIMES, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 47(9), 1996, pp. 669-671
Citation: Cl. Barry et L. Schamber, USER-DEFINED RELEVANCE CRITERIA - A COMPARISON OF 2 STUDIES, Proceedings of the ASIS annual meeting, 32, 1995, pp. 103-111
Citation: L. Schamber, A USER-BASED COGNITIVE APPROACH TO MODELING HIGHLY DYNAMIC INFORMATION PROBLEM SITUATIONS, Proceedings of the ASIS annual meeting, 32, 1995, pp. 157-162