Citation: D. Moher et Kf. Schulz, RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS IN CANCER - IMPROVING THE QUALITY OF THEIR REPORTS WILL ALSO FACILITATE BETTER CONDUCT, Annals of oncology, 9(5), 1998, pp. 483-487
Citation: Re. Roddy et al., MICROBICIDES, METAANALYSIS, AND THE N-9 QUESTION - WHERES THE RESEARCH, Sexually transmitted diseases, 25(3), 1998, pp. 151-153
Citation: Kf. Schulz, THE QUEST FOR UNBIASED RESEARCH - RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIALS AND THE CONSORT REPORTING GUIDELINES, Annals of neurology, 41(5), 1997, pp. 569-573
Citation: Kf. Schulz et al., BLINDING AND EXCLUSIONS AFTER ALLOCATION IN RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS - SURVEY OF PUBLISHED PARALLEL-GROUP TRIALS IN OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, BMJ. British medical journal, 312(7033), 1996, pp. 742-744
Citation: Da. Grimes et Kf. Schulz, DETERMINING SAMPLE-SIZE AND POWER IN CLINICAL-TRIALS - THE FORGOTTEN ESSENTIAL, Seminars in reproductive endocrinology, 14(2), 1996, pp. 125-131
Authors:
BEGG C
CHO M
EASTWOOD S
HORTON R
MOHER D
OLKIN I
PITKIN R
RENNIE D
SCHULZ KF
SIMEL D
STROUP DF
Citation: C. Begg et al., IMPROVING THE QUALITY OF REPORTING OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS - THE CONSORT STATEMENT, JAMA, the journal of the American Medical Association, 276(8), 1996, pp. 637-639
Citation: Da. Grimes et Kf. Schulz, A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL WITHOUT RANDOMIZATION, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 175(1), 1996, pp. 240-241
Citation: Da. Grimes et Kf. Schulz, METHODOLOGY CITATIONS AND THE QUALITY OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALSIN OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 174(4), 1996, pp. 1312-1315
Citation: Kf. Schulz, UNBIASED RESEARCH AND THE HUMAN SPIRIT - THE CHALLENGES OF RANDOMIZEDCONTROLLED TRIALS, CMAJ. Canadian Medical Association journal, 153(6), 1995, pp. 783-786
Citation: Kf. Schulz, EPISIOTOMY RESULTS STAND DESPITE LACK OF COMPLIANCE - RESPONSE, CMAJ. Canadian Medical Association journal, 153(12), 1995, pp. 1709-1710
Citation: Kf. Schulz et al., RESTRICTED RANDOMIZATION IN RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS - REPLY, JAMA, the journal of the American Medical Association, 274(23), 1995, pp. 1835-1836
Citation: Kf. Schulz, SUBVERTING RANDOMIZATION IN CONTROLLED TRIALS, JAMA, the journal of the American Medical Association, 274(18), 1995, pp. 1456-1458
Citation: Kf. Schulz et al., EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE OF BIAS - DIMENSIONS OF METHODOLOGICAL QUALITY ASSOCIATED WITH ESTIMATES OF TREATMENT EFFECTS IN CONTROLLED TRIALS, JAMA, the journal of the American Medical Association, 273(5), 1995, pp. 408-412
Citation: Rj. Hayes et al., THE COFACTOR EFFECT OF GENITAL ULCERS ON THE PER-EXPOSURE RISK OF HIVTRANSMISSION IN SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA, Journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 98(1), 1995, pp. 1-8
Citation: Kf. Schulz et al., ASSESSING THE QUALITY OF RANDOMIZATION FROM REPORTS OF CONTROLLED TRIALS PUBLISHED IN OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY JOURNALS, JAMA, the journal of the American Medical Association, 272(2), 1994, pp. 125-128
Citation: Da. Grimes et al., IMMUNIZATION AS THERAPY FOR RECURRENT SPONTANEOUS-ABORTION - A REVIEWAND METAANALYSIS - REPLY, Obstetrics and gynecology, 83(4), 1994, pp. 637-638
Citation: Ej. Fraser et al., IMMUNIZATION AS THERAPY FOR RECURRENT SPONTANEOUS-ABORTION - A REVIEWAND METAANALYSIS, Obstetrics and gynecology, 82(5), 1993, pp. 854-859