Citation: Jma. Meyer et al., WHAT IS THE INTERVAL BETWEEN BIOPSY RECOM MENDATION AND BIOPSY AND HOW MUCH INFORMATION IS FED BACK TO THE MAMMOGRAPHY PHYSICIAN - EXPERIENCES WITH 317 BREAST BIOPSIES IN A REGIONAL QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT FOR SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHY, Der Pathologe, 18(1), 1997, pp. 60-66
Authors:
WARMERDAM PG
DEKONING HJ
BOER R
BEEMSTERBOER PMM
DIERKS ML
SWART E
ROBRA BP
Citation: Pg. Warmerdam et al., QUANTITATIVE ESTIMATES OF THE IMPACT OF SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY IN MAMMOGRAPHIC SCREENING IN GERMANY, Journal of epidemiology and community health, 51(2), 1997, pp. 180-186
Authors:
SWART E
ROBRA BP
DIERKS ML
FRISCHBIER HJ
HOEFFKEN W
Citation: E. Swart et al., QUALITY ASSURANCE BY IMPROVED STRUCTURES OF COOPERATION - THE EXAMPLEOF DECENTRALIZED SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHY, Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde, 55(10), 1995, pp. 559-565
Authors:
BEEMSTERBOER PMM
DEKONING HJ
WARMERDAM PG
BOER R
SWART E
DIERKS ML
ROBRA BP
Citation: Pmm. Beemsterboer et al., PREDICTION OF THE EFFECTS AND COSTS OF BREAST-CANCER SCREENING IN GERMANY, International journal of cancer, 58(5), 1994, pp. 623-628
Authors:
SWART E
ROBRA BP
DIERKS ML
REINERTH H
FRISCHBIER HJ
BAHNSEN J
SCHREER I
HOEFFKEN W
Citation: E. Swart et al., OBSERVER VARIABILITY IN EARLY MAMMOGRAPHI C DIAGNOSIS - AN ROC ANALYSIS, RoFo. Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der neuenbildgebenden Verfahren, 159(2), 1993, pp. 187-193