Citation: K. Vandenbos et al., EVALUATING OUTCOMES BY MEANS OF THE FAIR PROCESS EFFECT - EVIDENCE FOR DIFFERENT PROCESSES IN FAIRNESS AND SATISFACTION JUDGMENTS, Journal of personality and social psychology, 74(6), 1998, pp. 1493-1503
Citation: R. Vermunt et al., FAIRNESS EVALUATIONS OF ENCOUNTERS WITH POLICE OFFICERS AND CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS, Journal of applied social psychology, 28(12), 1998, pp. 1107-1124
Citation: K. Vandenbos et al., HOW DO I JUDGE MY OUTCOME WHEN I DO NOT KNOW THE OUTCOME OF OTHERS - THE PSYCHOLOGY OF THE FAIR PROCESS EFFECT, Journal of personality and social psychology, 72(5), 1997, pp. 1034-1046
Citation: K. Vandenbos et al., PROCEDURAL AND DISTRIBUTIVE JUSTICE - WHAT IS FAIR DEPENDS MORE ON WHAT COMES FIRST THAN ON WHAT COMES NEXT, Journal of personality and social psychology, 72(1), 1997, pp. 95-104
Citation: E. Blaauw et al., TREATMENT IN POLICE CUSTODY - ORGANIZATIONAL CHARACTERISTICS AND PERFORMANCE OF CUSTODIAL DIVISIONS IN DUTCH POLICE ORGANIZATIONS, Criminal justice and behavior, 23(4), 1996, pp. 553-571
Citation: K. Vandenbos et al., THE CONSISTENCY RULE AND THE VOICE EFFECT - THE INFLUENCE OF EXPECTATIONS ON PROCEDURAL FAIRNESS JUDGMENTS AND PERFORMANCE, European journal of social psychology, 26(3), 1996, pp. 411-428
Citation: R. Vermunt, SOCIAL AND POLITICAL-ATTITUDES IN DUTCH SOCIETY - THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVES AND SURVEY EVIDENCE - DEKKER,P, ESTER,P, Social indicators research, 34(3), 1995, pp. 418-420