Citation: Pj. Wahlbeck et al., MARSHALLING THE COURT - BARGAINING AND ACCOMMODATION ON THE UNITED-STATES-SUPREME-COURT, American journal of political science, 42(1), 1998, pp. 294-315
Citation: L. Sigelman et al., VOTE CHOICE AND THE PREFERENCE FOR DIVIDED GOVERNMENT - LESSONS OF 1992, American journal of political science, 41(3), 1997, pp. 879-894
Citation: L. Sigelman et Pj. Wahlbeck, THE VEEPSTAKES - STRATEGIC CHOICE IN PRESIDENTIAL RUNNING MATE SELECTION, The American political science review, 91(4), 1997, pp. 855-864
Citation: F. Maltzman et Pj. Wahlbeck, MAY IT PLEASE THE CHIEF - OPINION ASSIGNMENTS IN THE REHNQUIST COURT, American journal of political science, 40(2), 1996, pp. 421-443
Citation: F. Maltzman et Pj. Wahlbeck, INSIDE THE US SUPREME-COURT - THE RELIABILITY OF THE JUSTICES CONFERENCE RECORDS, The Journal of politics, 58(2), 1996, pp. 528-539
Citation: F. Maltzman et Pj. Wahlbeck, STRATEGIC POLICY CONSIDERATIONS AND VOTING FLUIDITY ON THE BURGER COURT, The American political science review, 90(3), 1996, pp. 581-592
Citation: Jf. Spriggs et Pj. Wahlbeck, CALLING IT QUITS - STRATEGIC RETIREMENT ON THE FEDERAL-COURTS OF APPEALS, 1893-1991, Political research quarterly, 48(3), 1995, pp. 573-597