BIOLOGICAL MONITORING OF HEXAMETHYLENE DIISOCYANATE BY DETERMINATION OF 1,6-HEXAMETHYLENE DIAMINE AS THE TRIFLUOROETHYL CHLOROFORMATE DERIVATIVE USING CAPILLARY GAS-CHROMATOGRAPHY WITH THERMOIONIC AND SELECTIVE-ION MONITORING
M. Dalene et al., BIOLOGICAL MONITORING OF HEXAMETHYLENE DIISOCYANATE BY DETERMINATION OF 1,6-HEXAMETHYLENE DIAMINE AS THE TRIFLUOROETHYL CHLOROFORMATE DERIVATIVE USING CAPILLARY GAS-CHROMATOGRAPHY WITH THERMOIONIC AND SELECTIVE-ION MONITORING, Journal of chromatography B. Biomedical applications, 656(2), 1994, pp. 319-328
Citations number
10
Categorie Soggetti
Chemistry Analytical
Journal title
Journal of chromatography B. Biomedical applications
A GC method using a novel derivatization reagent, 2',2',2-trifluoroeth
yl chloroformate (TFECF), for the derivatization of primary and second
ary aliphatic amines with the formation of carbamate esters is present
ed. The method is based on a derivatization procedure in a two-phase s
ystem, where the carbamate ester is formed. The method is applied to t
he determination of 1,6-hexamethylene diamine (HDA) in aqueous solutio
ns and human urine, using capillary GC. Detection was performed using
thermionic specific detection (TSD) and mass spectrometry (MS)-selecti
ve-ion monitoring (SIM) using electron-impact (EI) and chemical ioniza
tion (CI) with ammonia monitoring both positive (CI)(+) and negative i
ons (CI)(-). Quantitative measurements were made in the chemical ioniz
ation mode monitoring both positive and negative ions. Tetra-deuterium
-labelled HDA (TDHDA; (H2NCH2)-H-2(CH2)(4)(CH2NH2)-H-2) was used as th
e internal standard for the GC-MS analysis. In CI+ the m/z 386 and the
m/z 390 ions corresponding to the [M + 18](+) ions (M = molecular ion
) of HDA-TFECF and TDHDA-TFECF were measured; in CI- the m/z 267 and t
he m/z 271 ions corresponding to the [M - 101](-) ions. The overall re
covery was found to be 97 +/- 5% for a HDA concentration of 1000 mu g/
l in urine. The minimal detectable concentration in urine was found to
be less than 20 mu g/l using GC-TSD and 0.5 mu g/l using GC-SIM. The
overall precision for the work-up procedure and GC analysis was ca. 3%
(n = 5) for 1000 mu g/l HDA-spiked urine, and ca. 4% (n = 5) for 100
mu g/l. The precision using GC-SIM for urine samples spiked to a conce
ntration of 5 mu g/l was found to be 6.3% (n = 10).