Jl. Elmhurst et al., INTESTINAL EFFECTS OF ISOPROSTANES - EVIDENCE FOR THE INVOLVEMENT OF PROSTANOID EP AND TP RECEPTORS, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics, 282(3), 1997, pp. 1198-1205
The isoprostanes, which differ from prostaglandins by the cis orientat
ion of their side chains, are believed to exert their biological effec
ts on either a prostanoid TP receptor or a ''unique'' isoprostane rece
ptor. Preliminary experiments suggested that canine colonic epithelium
possessed no prostanoid TP receptor activity, in contrast to the musc
ularis mucosae, which responds well to the selective prostanoid TP rec
eptor agonist U46619. To define the receptors involved, the in vitro r
esponses of the epithelium and muscularis mucosae from the canine prox
imal colon to both 8-iso-PGE(2) and 8-iso-PGF(2 alpha) were compared.
The epithelium responded to 8-iso-PGE(2) but not to 8-iso-PGF(2 alpha)
. Under basal conditions, 8-iso-PGE(2) produced concentration-dependen
t increases in short circuit current (pEC(50) = 6.4 +/- 0.1) that were
not antagonized by the selective prostanoid TP receptor antagonist SQ
29548 (10(-6) M). Cross-desensitization experiments suggested that the
stimulant effects involved a prostanoid EP receptor. Desensitization
of the epithelium to PGE(2) resulted in unexpected decreases in short
circuit current in response to 8-iso-PGE(2) (10(-6) M). This effect wa
s mimicked by the selective prostanoid TP receptor agonist U46619 (10(
-5) M), and antagonized by three structurally different prostanoid TP
receptor antagonists: L670596 (10(-6) M), SQ29548 (10(-6) M) and GR321
91 (10(-6) M). 8-Iso-PGE(2), 8-iso-PGF(2 alpha) and U46619 caused conc
entration-dependent increases in the force of contraction of the muscu
laris mucosae strips. These responses were antagonized by selective pr
ostanoid TP receptor antagonists, arguing for the involvement of prost
anoid TP receptors. Thus, the effects of isoprostanes on the canine co
lon involve both prostanoid TP and EP receptors.