Ca. Fairbanks et Gl. Wilcox, ACUTE TOLERANCE TO SPINALLY ADMINISTERED MORPHINE COMPARES MECHANISTICALLY WITH CHRONICALLY INDUCED MORPHINE-TOLERANCE, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics, 282(3), 1997, pp. 1408-1417
The mechanistic similarity between acutely and chronically induced mor
phine tolerance has been previously proposed but remains largely unexp
lored. Our experiments examined the modulation of acutely induced tole
rance to spinally administered morphine by agonists that affect the N-
methyl-D-aspartate receptor and nitric oxide synthase systems. Antinoc
iception was detected via the hot water (52.5 degrees C) tail flick te
st in mice. Intrathecal pretreatment with morphine (40 nmol) produced
a 9.6-fold rightward shift in the morphine dose-response curve, This s
hift confirmed the induction of acute spinal morphine tolerance, Intra
thecal copretreatment with the receptor antagonists (competitive and n
oncompetitive, respectively) dizolcipine (MK801, 3 nmol) or LY235959 (
4 pmol) and morphine [40 nmol, intrathecally (i.t.)] attenuated acute
tolerance to morphine measured 8 hr later. A 60-min pretreatment of 7-
nitroindazole (6 nmol, i.t.), a selective neuronal NOS inhibitor, foll
owed by administration of morphine (40 nmol, i.t.) blocked the inducti
on of morphine tolerance. Intrathecal copretreatment with morphine (40
nmol, i.t.) and agmatine (4 nmol, i.t.), an imidazoline, receptor ago
nist and putative nitric oxide synthase inhibitor, almost completely a
bolished acute spinal morphine tolerance. The results of these experim
ents agree with previous reports using models of chronically induced m
orphine tolerance. This evidence supports the proposal that the mechan
isms responsible for acute morphine tolerance parallel those underlyin
g chronic morphine tolerance. This study attests to the powerful predi
ctive value of acute induction as a model for morphine tolerance.