Kp. Hymel et al., COMPARISON OF INTRACRANIAL COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC (CT) FINDINGS IN PEDIATRIC ABUSIVE AND ACCIDENTAL HEAD TRAUMA, Pediatric radiology, 27(9), 1997, pp. 743-747
Citations number
34
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging",Pediatrics
Background. Child abuse specialists rely heavily on diagnostic neuroim
aging. Objectives. Study objectives were: (1) to compare the frequenci
es of six specific intracranial CT abnormalities in accidental and non
accidental pediatric head trauma, and (2) to assess interobserver agre
ement regarding these CT findings. Materials and methods. Three pediat
ric radiologists blindly and independently reviewed cranial CT scans o
f pediatric patients who sustained closed head trauma between 1991 and
1994. All patients were less than 4 years of age. Study cases include
d thirty-nine (50 %) with nonaccidental head trauma and thirty-nine (5
0 %) with accidental head trauma. Each scan was evaluated for the pres
ence or absence of the following six intracranial findings: (1) interh
emispheric falx hemorrhage, (2) subdural hemorrhage, (3) large (non-ac
ute) extra-axial fluid, (4) basal ganglia edema, (5) posterior fossa h
emorrhage, and (6) frontal-parietal shearing tear(s). Interobserver ag
reement was calculated as the percentage of total cases in which all r
eviewers agreed a specific CT finding was present or absent. Diagnosis
required independent agreement by all three pediatric radiologists. T
he frequencies of these six intracranial CT abnormalities were compare
d between the two study groups by Chi-square analysis and Fisher's exa
ct test. Results. Interobserver agreement between radiologists was gre
ater than 80 % for all. lesions evaluated, with the exception of front
al-parietal shearing tear(s). Interhemispheric fair hemorrhage, subdur
al hemorrhage, large (non-acute) extra-axial fluid, and basal ganglia
edema were discovered significantly more frequently in non-accidental
trauma (P less than or equal to.05). Conclusion. Although not specific
for child abuse, discovery of these intracranial CT abnormalities in
young patients should prompt careful evaluation of family and injury c
ircumstances for indicators of nonaccidental trauma.