Ei. Eger et al., RECOVERY AND KINETIC CHARACTERISTICS OF DESFLURANE AND SEVOFLURANE INVOLUNTEERS AFTER 8-H EXPOSURE, INCLUDING KINETICS OF DEGRADATION PRODUCTS, Anesthesiology, 87(3), 1997, pp. 517-526
Background: Desflurane and sevoflurane permit speedier changes in anes
thetic partial pressures than do older halogenated anesthetics. The au
thors determined the kinetic characteristics of desflurane and sevoflu
rane and those of compound A [CH2F-O-C(=CF2)(CF3)], a nephrotoxic degr
adation product of sevoflurane. Methods: Volunteers received 1.25 mini
mum alveolar concentration of desflurane or sevoflurane, each administ
ered for 8 h in a fresh gas inflow of 2 1/min. Inspired (F-I) and end-
tidal (F-A) concentrations of anesthetic and compound A were measured
during administration, and F-A relative to F-AO (the last end-tidal co
ncentration during administration) during elimination. The indices of
recovery mere also measured. Results: The ratio F-I/F-A rapidly approa
ched 1.0, with values greater for sevoflurane (desflurane 1.06 +/- 0.0
1 vs. sevoflurane 1.11 +/- 0.02, mean +/- SD). The ratio F-A/F-I for c
ompound A was approximately 0.8. The F-A/F-AO ratio decreased slightly
more rapidly with desflurane than with sevoflurane, and objective mea
sures indicated faster recovery with desflurane: The initial response
to command (14 +/- 4 min vs. 28 +/- 8 min [means +/- SD]) and orientat
ion (19 +/- 4 vs. 33 +/- 9 min) was quicker, and recovery mas faster a
s defined by results of the Digit Symbol Substitution, P-deletion, and
Trieger tests. Desflurane produced less vomiting (1 [0.5, 3]; median
[quartiles] episodes) than did sevoflurane (5 [2.5, 7.5] episodes). Th
e F-A/F-AO ratio for compound A decreased within 5 min to a constant v
alue of 0.1. Conclusions: These anesthetics have kinetics consistent w
ith their solubilities. Sevoflurane's greater biodegradation probably
increases FI/F-A differences during anesthetic administration and decr
eases F-A/F-AO differences during elimination. The F-A for compound A
differs from F-I by 20% (F-A/F-I = 0.8) because of substantial degrada
tion. Recovery from anesthesia proceeds nearly twice as fast with desf
lurane than with sevoflurane. Differences in ventilation, or alveolar
or tissue elimination, do not completely explain the slower recovery w
ith sevoflurane.