SKELETAL-MUSCLE OF TRAINED AND UNTRAINED PARAPLEGICS AND TETRAPLEGICS

Citation
P. Schantz et al., SKELETAL-MUSCLE OF TRAINED AND UNTRAINED PARAPLEGICS AND TETRAPLEGICS, Acta Physiologica Scandinavica, 161(1), 1997, pp. 31-39
Citations number
36
Categorie Soggetti
Physiology
ISSN journal
00016772
Volume
161
Issue
1
Year of publication
1997
Pages
31 - 39
Database
ISI
SICI code
0001-6772(1997)161:1<31:SOTAUP>2.0.ZU;2-X
Abstract
The effect of physical conditioning on skeletal muscle or individuals with spinal cord injuries (SCI) has been investigated. The anterior po rtion of the deltoid muscle (active in wheel-chair propulsion) of untr ained and endurance-trained paraplegics and tetraplegics, as well as t hat of untrained able-bodied subjects, was studied. The characterizati on involved fibre type distribution. capillarization, fibre areas and also oxidative and glycolytic enzyme levels. A general trend towards a successively higher proportion of type I fibres and lower proportion of type IIB fibres was noted in the order of able-bodied subjects (typ e I, 42%; type II B, 41%. n = 8), paraplegics (type I, 57%; type II B, 13%, n = 13) and tetraplegics (type I, 74%; type II B, 4.5%, n = 11). The trained SCI groups had significantly higher levels of the citric acid cycle marker enzyme citrate synthase (34% and 63%) than the untra ined SCI groups and able-bodied subjects, respectively. The glycolytic marker enzyme 6-phosphofructokinase was 32% lower in the tetraplegic groups than in the other groups. In contrast, the fatty acid oxidation marker enzyme 3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase was markedly higher in the tetraplegic group than in the able-bodied subjects (58%) and tende d to be higher (21%, P < 0.1) than in the paraplegic group. The traine d SCI groups displayed significantly higher (28%) levels of capillarie s per fibre than the untrained SCI groups, which had about the same le vels as the untrained able-bodied subjects. it is concluded that sever al of the findings are in line with normal muscular adaptation, wherea s others are unexpected and support a hypothesis that some of the find ings might be due to differences between the groups in, for instance. hormone levels or in types of muscular load.