The put-pose of this study was to investigate the political behaviors
which firms use to deal with the political imperatives associated with
international markets. The overarching hypothesis was that as politic
al imperatives baring foreign market access increase so too will firm-
level political behaviors designed to reduce these imperatives. Using
a mail questionnaire data collection format, 171 completed survey inst
ruments were obtained from executive-level decision markers at major U
.S. corporations. The results show that: (1) firms engage in political
activities designed to reduce the effects of political imperatives in
foreign markets, and (2) the emphasis placed on these activities diff
ers significantly depending upon the political imperative in question.
Firms facing high levels of foreign transfer restrictions emphasize f
oreign lobbying, political industry alliances, political inducements,
and political action committees. Firms facing high levels of domestic
transfer restrictions do not significantly emphasize political inducem
ents, but add domestic lobbying, public relations, and friendships wit
h U.S. government officials to the activities associated with foreign
transfer restrictions. On the other hand, firms facing high levels of
ownership/control restrictions emphasize foreign lobbying and politica
l industry alliances. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science Inc.